Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
VAT - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights February 2020 Year 2020 This

Levy of penalty u/s 54(1)(14) of the UP VAT Act, 2008 - Unfilled ...


High Court Rules Intent to Evade Tax Must Be Proven for Penalty Under UP VAT Act Section 54(1)(14.

February 21, 2020

Case Laws     VAT and Sales Tax     HC

Levy of penalty u/s 54(1)(14) of the UP VAT Act, 2008 - Unfilled (blank) column No.8 of Form 38 - The Tribunal has not correctly applied the law in this regard, as they have not given any finding about the intention to evade tax, which is a precondition for imposition of penalty. - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Levy of penalty u/s 54(1) (14) of the U.P. VAT Act - The court held that in the absence of a cogent finding of an intention to evade tax, the levy of penalty under...

  2. Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

  3. Imposition of penalty under Section 54(1) (14) of UP VAT Act - The Tribunal has only observed that non-filing of various columns in Form 38 indicates that there was...

  4. Levy of penalty - at the time of detention was that one of the E-Way Bills had expired - The High court held that mens rea to evade tax is essential for imposing...

  5. Levy of penalty for violation of section 129 and Rule 138 - Failure to update the E-way bill on change of vehicle after breakdown - The imposition of penalties for mere...

  6. Levy of penalty u/s 54(1)(2) of the U.P. VAT Act, 2008 - men-rea - The Court concluded that mens rea is indeed an essential prerequisite for imposing a penalty under...

  7. The key points are: Appropriation of Rs. 11,00,000 deposited under protest during investigation cannot be considered as acceptance of liability. The extended period of...

  8. Penalty u/s 54(1)(14) of UP VAT - import of goods into the State by road against a declaration form - contravention of the provisions of Section 50 - The guilty mind...

  9. Penalty order - Part-B of the e-way bill was not filled up - intent to evade tax - The High court, referencing a previous judgment, ruled that such technical errors, in...

  10. The petitioner is required to calculate taxable turnover by excluding turnover not subjected to tax, exempt goods, and labor/service charges for works contracts as per...

  11. The case involved the determination of penalty u/s 69(1)(k) of the J&K Value Added Tax Act, 2005 for the issuance of 35 improper invoices on the same day. The High Court...

  12. Levy of penalty - non filling up of Part 'B' of the e-Way Bill - existence of mens rea or not The High Court referenced a specific case and highlighted that the issue of...

  13. Levy of penalty - goods were unloaded at a place that was not registered in the registration certificate - unloading goods at a location not specified in the e-way bill...

  14. The High Court quashed penalty u/s E-Way Bill violation, classifying goods as ODC due to speed without intent to evade tax. Relying on precedent, mens rea is essential...

  15. Penalty for non deduction of tax at source - bona fide belief proved - penalty set aside - AT

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates