Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - mistake of wrong classification of the ...

No Penalty for Misclassification of Securities u/s 271(1)(c) Due to Bona Fide Mistake in Tax Rate.

March 4, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - mistake of wrong classification of the securities yielding Long Term Capital Gain and consequently the assessee had paid the tax @ 10% instead of 20% - Once the assessee has explained the reasons for wrong classification as bona fide being inadvertent mistake, no penalty could be levied - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - mistake of wrong classification of the ...

No Penalty for Misclassification of Securities u/s 271(1)(c) Due to Bona Fide Mistake in Tax Rate.

March 4, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Explanation versus bona finde explanation versus proper disclosure - Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - AT

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - bona fide or mala fide with an intention to evade taxes - not exigible to levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act where the...

The ITAT held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was not imposable on the assessee. The assessee had voluntarily paid tax on income from sale of shares three years prior to...

Penalty 271(1)(c) - additions on account of donation and charity, and on account of loss on sale of assets, which were debited to the profit and loss account - The ITAT...

Penalty for non deduction of tax at source - bona fide belief proved - penalty set aside - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - If authority is satisfied that there was a reasonable cause, it may impose any penalty but inadvertent mistake cannot call for penalty in the...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - deduction of LTCG u/s 54F - The assessee acted in bona fide belief and made the claim is not acceptable due to any reason and was...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - addition u/s 68 - Penalty has been levied in a mechanical manner without application of mind. In our view, this is a serious mistake in the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - adjustment made u/s 92CA - penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) on the adjustment made u/s 92CA is not...

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - disallowance of depreciation - he explanation given by the assessee for the claim of depreciation is neither bona fide nor...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – In the garb of the bona fide claim an assessee cannot escape levy of penalty - Onus was not on the AO to prove the negative - AT

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) – assessee in bona fide belief that Dharmada collections were not part of its income but were diverted by an overriding title towards...

Imposition of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The explanation given by the assessee for the depreciation claim, is neither bona-fide, nor substantiated - penalty confirmed - HC

The assessee failed to file the original return of income, and the Assessing Officer initiated penalty proceedings for underreporting income. The assessee's authorized...

Quick Updates: