Validity of Proceeding u/s 158BC - satisfaction was not recorded ...

Tribunal Overturns Tax Orders Due to Lack of Recorded Satisfaction, Contradicting Supreme Court Precedent, Section 158BC Involved.

May 25, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Validity of Proceeding u/s 158BC - satisfaction was not recorded before completion of assessment proceeding - the order passed by the AO as well as the CIT (Appeals) has been set aside by the Tribunal merely on the ground that the satisfaction has not been recorded before completion of the assessment proceedings. The aforesaid finding is contrary to law laid down by the Apex Court.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of Proceeding u/s 158BC - satisfaction was not recorded ...

Tribunal Overturns Tax Orders Due to Lack of Recorded Satisfaction, Contradicting Supreme Court Precedent, Section 158BC Involved.

May 25, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

HC ruled penalty proceedings under sections 271D and 271E require explicit satisfaction to be recorded by Assessing Officer during reassessment. Mere recording of...

The Appellate Tribunal held that the assessment orders issued u/s 153C for the assessment years 2011-12 and 2012-13 were beyond the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non recording of satisfaction - When satisfaction for initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of IT Act is recorded by the AO in...

Gross violation of CBEC instructions and the precedential value of CESTAT decisions. The Revenue filed an appeal before the first Appellate Authority without specifying...

The assessee failed to deduct tax on professional fees paid to various non-residents. The Assessing Officer (AO) held that the fees were liable to tax in India under the...

The ITAT held that for penalty u/s 271D for contravention of section 269SS, recording satisfaction by AO is mandatory. Citing Jaya Laxmi Rice Mills case, it emphasized...

The assessment order passed u/s 153C was erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue's interest. The Assessing Officer initiated penalty proceedings u/s 271AAC instead of...

Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal quashed the assessment order u/s 144/147 and the demand notice u/s 156, treating them as non-existent due to the failure to mention the...

Proceedings u/s. 153C r.w.s. 153A - Recording of satisfaction - CIT (Appeals) not given finding that what basis he came to such conclusion that there was a recording of...

Penalty u/s. 271B - failure to get accounts audited - When a particular authority has been designated to record his satisfaction on any particular issue, then it is...

Absence of valid satisfaction recorded by AO before initiating assessment under special provision where search took place. Satisfaction note did not reveal AO's averment...

The ITAT held that the assessment years 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12 were beyond the 10-year limitation period u/s 153C read with Explanation-1 to section 153A. Hence,...

Disallowance u/s 14A - necessity of recording satisfaction - Dissatisfaction of the AO is expressly recorded in the assessment order. The said dissatisfaction has been...

Cancellation of GST registration of petitioner - appeal barred by limitation or not - appeal was filed after a period of four months - Noting the significance of proper...

Quick Updates: