Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2020 Year 2020 This

Reopening of assessment - if the Assessing Officer had no ...


Reassessment Orders Invalid if Officer Lacks Jurisdiction; Foundation for Reopening Assessment is Crucial.

June 13, 2020

Case Laws     Income Tax     HC

Reopening of assessment - if the Assessing Officer had no jurisdiction to initiate reassessment proceeding, the mere fact that subsequent orders have been passed would not render the challenge to jurisdiction infructuous. If the very basis for reopening assessment does not survive, orders on such re-opening would not survive too.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The ITAT Delhi held that the notice issued by a non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer u/s 148 was invalid. The jurisdiction over the assessee was with a different...

  2. Reassessment notices issued u/s 148 for assessment years 2018-19, 2019-20, and 2020-21 were time-barred by limitation. Withdrawal of approval u/s 10(23C)(vi) by the...

  3. The court held that the Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act for reassessment, as per Section 151A read with...

  4. Territorial Jurisdiction - proper officer or not - Registration was assigned to Central GST Officer - SCN was issued by the State GST officer - the distribution of work...

  5. Reassessment proceedings were held invalid due to lack of proper jurisdiction by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax while issuing the notice u/s 148. The...

  6. Validity of order of reassessment - in order to invoke jurisdiction u/s 22(1) of the VAT Act or to initiate proceedings for reassessment there must be an order of...

  7. The High Court held that for a valid reassessment notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, the Revenue must comply with Section 151A, which mandates the issuance of such...

  8. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Validity of approval u/s 151 - notice not issued by Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO) - There is no concurrent jurisdiction for Joint...

  9. The High Court quashed the reopening of assessments u/s 148, holding that the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer were cryptic, vague, lacking nexus, and...

  10. The High Court quashed the reopening notice issued by the Assessing Officer u/s 148 for reassessment beyond the period of four years. The assessee had filed returns...

  11. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Assessing Officer to usurp the jurisdiction to reopen the assessment - The first Assessing Officer has made the reassessment after...

  12. Validity of Reopening of assessment based on order passed u/s 263 - The Court found that the reassessment proceedings lacked the satisfaction of jurisdictional...

  13. The High Court held that the reassessment notice issued beyond the period of limitation was invalid and without jurisdiction. The impugned notice itself was illegal, and...

  14. Faceless assessment provisions u/s 151A require notice u/s 148 for income escaping assessment to be issued by Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO), not Jurisdictional...

  15. Jurisdiction of Preventive officer to initiate any proceeding including proceeding u/s 110(1) - Show Cause Notice for seized goods - The High Court determined that the...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates