Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2020 Year 2020 This

Penalty levied u/s. 271B - Defective notice - vague and ...


Penalty u/s 271B Dropped Due to Vague Notice; Assessee's Explanation Deemed Reasonable u/s 273B.

June 20, 2020

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Penalty levied u/s. 271B - Defective notice - vague and unspecific notice - failure to furnish the audit report u/s 44AB before the due date - Notice proposing penalty should clearly spell out the fault/charge for which the assessee is put on notice, so that he can defend the charge properly. - Further, the explanation given by the assessee cannot be held to be unreasonable. - No penalty since the delay in getting accounts of the earlier year can be reasonable ground as stipulated u/s. 273B

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Assessee's appeal allowed by ITAT against penalty u/s 271B for non-compliance with Section 44AB. Assessee demonstrated reasonable cause for failure to file return and...

  2. The assessee had not obtained and furnished the Audit Report from the Accountant within the due date. The Tribunal held that the levy of penalty u/s 271B is not...

  3. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

  4. Penalty levied u/s 271B - delayed furnishing of tax audit report u/s 44AB due to delay in getting statutory audit report under companies act - assessee had indeed...

  5. The assessee was levied penalty u/s 271B for delay in filing the audit report u/s 44AB within the stipulated time. The assessee contended that the invoices and other...

  6. Penalty u/s 271B - non filing / delayed filing of audit report - bonafide reasons - delay due to expiry of digital signature and due to technical glitch in the system -...

  7. The ITAT held that the penalty u/s 271AAB could not be levied due to a defective notice. The AO failed to specify the specific limb for initiating penalty proceedings,...

  8. Penalty levied u/s 271G - Assessee has failed to maintain the information as per Rule 10D (1) (d), (g), (h) and (m) of Income Tax Rules - ‘reaso-nable cause’ under...

  9. Penalty u/s 271B was levied on the assessee for failure to get accounts audited despite turnover exceeding prescribed limit u/s 44AB. The Assessing Officer relied solely...

  10. Penalty u/s 271B - not getting the books of account audited u/s 44AB - AO levied penalty on the assessee as the cash deposit during the F.Y. 2016-17 exceeded the...

  11. Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - the assessee has given reasonable and plausible explanation that the accountant has committed mistake while preparing the accounts as the...

  12. Penalty u/s 271B - non-filing of Tax audit report u/sec. 44AB of the Act within the due date under section 139(1) - Due to technical issues and pressure of work, the...

  13. Penalty u/s 271AAB - Defects in the notice issued u/s 274 - CIT(A) reduced the penalty to 10% applying provisions of Section 271AAB(a) of the Act as against penalty...

  14. Penalty u/s 271B - imposition of penalty u/s 271B is discretionary not mandatory as word used in section is "may" - no penalty if there is existence of reasonable cause.

  15. Levy of penalty u/s. 271B - failure to get his books audited and furnish Audit Report u/s. 44AB - Section 271B as extracted above further throws light on the legislative...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates