Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
VAT - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2020 Year 2020 This

Assessment in the name of merged company - MAPL had been merged ...


Assessing Officer Erred by Continuing Proceedings Against Non-Existent Company After Merger, Violating Proper Protocol.

August 4, 2020

Case Laws     VAT and Sales Tax     HC

Assessment in the name of merged company - MAPL had been merged with the petitioner, MEPL - the 1st respondent, who is the Assessing Officer of the MAPL, ought to have dropped further proceedings since the assessee was no longer in existence. - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Draft assessment order u/s 144C in the name of a non-existent company - amalgamation of the company under the scheme of merger - the draft order framed u/s 144C(1) of...

  2. Assessment against non existent company - name of company struck off by ROC - Assessment based on Seized Materials - The Tribunal noted that the Assessing Officer was...

  3. The High Court quashed the reassessment proceedings initiated against the non-existent amalgamating company. Relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Maruti Suzuki...

  4. Validity of assessment against non existent company - amalgamation proceedings concluded - the assessment order passed on a non-existent Company is bad in law, inasmuch...

  5. The case pertains to the validity of an assessment order against a company that had already undergone amalgamation. The key points are: The assessment order was passed...

  6. The High Court held that once a proper officer initiates proceedings on a subject matter under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) or the Haryana...

  7. As per the Scheme of Amalgamation, the effective merger date of the petitioner company with another company was 01.04.2012. Post-merger, the petitioner ceased to exist,...

  8. Assessment order passed against a non-existent entity due to merger of companies is invalid. The assessment order was passed in the name of Genpact India, which had...

  9. Validity of reassessment proceedings against non-existent entities or amalgamating companies. The key points are: 1) Initiating or continuing proceedings against a...

  10. Validity of reopening of assessment - notice against non existent entity / amalgamated company - Notices issued.

  11. Assessment against a company which was non-existent is invalid - AT

  12. Dishonor of Cheque - insufficiency of funds - existence of company after merger - When under a judicial order, merger of the Companies has taken place, the earlier...

  13. Revision u/s 263 - bogus purchase - proof of nexus between the purchases and sales - once submission/reply filed by the assessee, pursuant to enquiry by the Assessing...

  14. Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - assessee had failed to provide full submissions - penalty levied by the Assessing Officer u/s 271(1)(b) of the IT Act deserves to be...

  15. Regarding the disallowance of late deposit of ESI/PF u/s 36(1)(va), following the Supreme Court's ratio in Checkmate Services, the ITAT allowed the Revenue's ground and...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates