Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2020 Year 2020 This

Principles of Natural Justice - Classification of imported goods ...


Customs Case Highlights Procedural Lapses in Naptha Classification; Importance of Evidence in Cross-Examination.

August 27, 2020

Case Laws     Customs     AT

Principles of Natural Justice - Classification of imported goods - Naptha - cross examination of the Chemical Examiner - lacunas in the testing procedure - It is seen that during cross examination of the Chemical Assistant Grade-I has clearly stated that log books and the registers are maintained in their laboratory, however, appellants chose not to ask for the same and Revenue chose not to produce the same - The entire purpose of remanding the case is defeated if the facts are not brought out completely. I - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Classification of the imported goods - ‘Activity trackers’ - rate of duty - Legal Niceties in Classification - The Tribunal observes deficiencies in the adjudicating...

  2. CESTAT Mumbai analyzed the case involving 'API supari' to determine the rate of duty and the applicability of Advance Ruling u/s 28J of Customs Act, 1962. The tribunal...

  3. CENVAT credit - procedural lapses - whether credit of Cenvat taken on the basis of ISD Invoices issued by the Head Office of the appellant units is deniable for curable...

  4. Validity of reopening notice - Absence of the manual/digital signature of the A.O in the copy of the Reopening notice - Elaborating on the term "signed", it was observed...

  5. HC set aside penalty order u/s 270A and notice of demand u/s 156 due to procedural oversight. Department acknowledged they weren't informed about pending appeal...

  6. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 or u/s 153C - validity of proceedings - The High Court emphasized the need for the Assessing Officer to properly apply relevant...

  7. The case involved the Appellate Tribunal addressing issues regarding the scope of Show Cause Notice (SCN) and compliance with Customs notifications. The Tribunal held...

  8. Customs broker misclassified goods (safety matches) to obtain higher MEIS benefit for exporter. Charges were levied u/s 114(iii) of Customs Act, 1962. Key points:...

  9. The case involved a challenge to the imposition of penalties and confiscation of goods under the Customs Act, 1962. The Appellate Tribunal found that the penalties...

  10. The Appellate Tribunal addressed the rejection of the assessee's claim for a lower tax rate u/s 115BAA due to non-filing of Form 10IC on time. The CIT(A) dismissed the...

  11. The case involves the statutory interpretation of Entry 41 of Schedule II of the Act regarding the classification of a product as a medicated ointment. The court...

  12. Confiscation - imported four Mercedes Benz cars - restricted goods or not - While recognizing the mandatory nature of the type approval certificate under Rule 126 CMVR,...

  13. Rebate/ refund claim - case of appellant is that rebate claim cannot be rejected on the ground of procedural lapses such as non-payment under correct category, filing of...

  14. Classification of imported goods - Drones - Tello drones with or without camera would merit classification under heading 9503 of the first schedule to the Customs Tariff...

  15. Seeking grant of Interim bail - challenge to arrest of Arvind Kejriwal by the Directorate of Enforcement - The case involved significant procedural developments,...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates