Jurisdiction of AAR to decide an issue because of non-existence ...

AAR can't decide issues without "Jurisdictional Fact" u/s 245R(2); notice under 143(2) doesn't mean pending question.

August 29, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Jurisdiction of AAR to decide an issue because of non-existence of “Jurisdictional Fact” u/s 245R(2) - Issue was already pending - a question cannot be said to be pending under Clause (i) of proviso to Section 245R(2) upon issuance of a mere notice under Section 143(2) of the Act, especially when it has been issued in a standard pre-printed format and the questions raised before the authority for advance ruling do not appear to be forming the subject matter of the said notice. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Jurisdiction of AAR to decide an issue because of non-existence ...

AAR can't decide issues without "Jurisdictional Fact" u/s 245R(2); notice under 143(2) doesn't mean pending question.

August 29, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Assessment framed without issuing mandatory notice u/s 143(2) by jurisdictional officer. Assessee filed return with Range-1(1), notice u/s 143(2) issued by ITO,...

Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - AO did not issue the notice under section 143(2) - It is the discretion of the Assessing Officer to accept the return of...

Section 142(1) notice issued by non-jurisdictional officer held valid. Plain reading of Section 143(2) indicates either Assessing Officer or prescribed income-tax...

Validity of re-assessment proceedings - jurisdiction to issue notice - Validity of notice u/s 143(2) as issued by the ITO, Ward 33(2)(3) who was not empowered - ITO who...

Validity of assessment - no notice u/s 143(2) - the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer (DCIT) was bad in law for want of issuance of notice u/s 143(2) of...

Notice u/s 143(2) issued by a non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer/Deputy Commissioner is invalid and cannot be cured. The assessment order framed u/s 143(3) based on...

The HC quashed the notice issued u/s 143(2) by the JAO for AY 2023-24, holding that the JAO lacked jurisdiction. As per section 144B(1)(iii), for scrutiny assessment...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147/148 - failure to issue notice u/s 143(2) - reopening of assessment is not valid as the Income Tax Department has power to conduct the...

The HC held that the Jurisdictional Assessment Officer (JAO) has exclusive jurisdiction to issue notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act. For assessment, re-assessment or...

The High Court examined the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer (AO) and the prescribed income-tax authority to issue notices u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. It held...

Validity of the notice issued u/s. 143(2) - statutory time limit to issue notice - the AO has issued notice u/s. 143(2) on 12/10/2020 after expiry of six months from the...

Validity of assessment order - Transfer of case from jurisdiction - Notice u/s 143(2) was issued by the ITO Ward-2, Malegaon, Nasik, Maharashtra whereas Assessment order...

Meaning of expression ‘Served’ / 'issued' - Notice u/s 143(2) - The date of receipt of notice cannot be left to be undetermined dependent upon the will of the addressee....

Validity of Notice issued u/s 143(2) - Defective return - Removal of defect beyond 15 days u/s 139(9) - AO should have treated the return as non-est when the assessee...

If the Assessing Officer has time in his hands to issue notice u/s 143(2), why is he issuing notice u/s 148, we do not understand, specifically in the background of the...

Quick Updates: