Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defective notice - Even where it is held ...

Court Rules Penalty Order Valid: Defective Notice u/s 271(1)(c) Clarified During Penalty Process, No Assessee Prejudice Found.

September 2, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defective notice - Even where it is held that the charge is uncertain at the initiation stage, the same has been made definite while passing the penalty order, therefore, it is not a case of lack of opportunity to the assessee as well as lack of application of mind on the part of the Assessing officer. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defective notice - Even where it is held ...

Court Rules Penalty Order Valid: Defective Notice u/s 271(1)(c) Clarified During Penalty Process, No Assessee Prejudice Found.

September 2, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - Emphasizing the principles outlined by the Karnataka High Court, the Tribunal reaffirmed the importance of...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defective notice - non specification of charge - Assessing Officer has issued a vague and defective notice under section 274 r.w.s....

Defective notice issued u/s 274 read with Section 271(1)(c) for levying penalty. The key points are: The phrases "conceal" and "furnishing of inaccurate particulars" in...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - The notice u/s. 274 r.w.s. 271(l)(c) of the Act were issued without striking off the irrelevant portion of the limb...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Mandation of specification of charge - It is clear that for the AO to assume jurisdiction u/s 271(1)(c), proper notice is necessary and the...

Levy of penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - defective notice - it would be too technical and pedantic to take the view that because in the printed notice the inapplicable portion...

The assessee challenged the penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(c) for short credit of sale consideration received from the sale of copyrights and cable rights. The issue...

Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Non specification of charge - defective notice - as the A.O had clearly failed to discharge his statutory obligation of fairly putting the...

The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

Section 271(1)(c) penalty was held invalid due to improper issuance of notice, as no proceedings were pending when the notice was issued on 19.12.2019. Section 271A...

The ITAT Mumbai addressed two key issues in the case. Firstly, regarding the penalty u/s 271(1)(c), the tribunal held that the absence of a tick mark on the notice did...

Notice u/s 271AAB to levy penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - AO gets the jurisdiction to levy the penalty by issuing a notice and therefore, it is not a procedural requirement but...

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving a penalty u/s 271(1)(C) for a defective notice related to TP adjustments. The AO determined arm's length OP/OC at...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non-compliance of notice issues - if the quantum proceedings itself are declared to be bad in law and quashed , then any non compliance on the...

Quick Updates: