Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2020 Year 2020 This

Imposition of penalty u/s 114 AA of Customs Act for abatement - ...


Textile Broker Penalized u/s 114 AA for Assisting in Inflating FOB Values to Claim Higher DEPB Benefits.

September 11, 2020

Case Laws     Customs     AT

Imposition of penalty u/s 114 AA of Customs Act for abatement - Textile Broker - allegation that appellant facilatated in inflating the FOB value for the purpose of wrongly claiming higher DEPB benefits - it is found that this appellant have facilitated the main accused M/s J.S. Designer Ltd. and its Directors in inflating FOB value of goods for export, by justifying the cost, indirectly - Levy of penalty confirmed (reduced from ₹ 25 lakhs to ₹ 7,50,000/- ) - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Rejection of declared F.O.B. value and imposition of penalty u/ss 114(iii) and 114AA of Customs Act, 1962 upheld. Market enquiry conducted in presence of appellant's...

  2. Appellant imported automotive windshields. Investigation revealed parallel invoices - one with actual higher valuation and another with suppressed lower valuation...

  3. Imposition of penalty u/s 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 on Customs Broker - undervaluation - in the guise of re-determination of value of goods, the Adjudicating...

  4. CESTAT ruled that Free on Board (FOB) value is the transaction value agreed between buyer and seller, which cannot be modified by any Customs officer or third party. The...

  5. Levy of penalty on appellant u/s 114 (i) and 114 AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - assisting / abetment of export of Muriate of Potash - illicit export of goods - Based on...

  6. Levy of penalty on the appellants u/s 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 - Customs Broker firm - A Custom Broker is supposed to safeguard the interests of both exporters and...

  7. Customs broker firm handled eight shipping bills involving overvaluation of export goods. Exporter prepared eight separate invoices, directing broker to file accordingly....

  8. Levy of penalty u/s 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962 on Customs Broker - All the allegations if any, would fall under the Customs Broker Licensing Regulations. No...

  9. Customs broker misclassified goods (safety matches) to obtain higher MEIS benefit for exporter. Charges were levied u/s 114(iii) of Customs Act, 1962. Key points:...

  10. The case involved a Customs Broker facing penalties under Customs Brokers Licensing Regulation 2013 for alleged aiding in misclassification of goods. The Appellate...

  11. Girls Trousers or Legging - claimed drawback rate - Rate of DBK @ 8.80% of FOB or 1% of FOB value - CGOVT

  12. CESTAT Chennai held that penalty u/s 114 Customs Act was not imposed on Respondents for smuggling undeclared cigarettes concealed with gypsum plaster. Penalty was...

  13. Levy of penalty u/s 114 (i) and u/s 114 AA of FA - Smuggling - red sanders - replacement of the goods enroute with red sander - penalty imposed only on ground that the...

  14. Levy of penalty u/s 114 (iii) of the Customs Act, 1962 and u/s 114 AA of the Act - Global container carrier (shipping line) and provides liner shipping services...

  15. Jurisdiction - power of Additional Director General of DRI to issue SCN - Penalties were imposed under section 114, 114A and 114 AA of Customs Act - The SCN under...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates