Revision u/s 263 - No error in the action of AO in not ...

PCIT wrongly used section 263; AO didn't err by not addressing unrelated issues during reassessment. Unwarranted action.

September 11, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Revision u/s 263 - No error in the action of AO in not travelling to other issues for making addition once no addition was made on the issue for which assessment was reopened. The PCIT clearly erred in invoking revisional jurisdiction on an issue, which the Assessing Officer could not have examined in reassessment proceedings. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 - No error in the action of AO in not ...

PCIT wrongly used section 263; AO didn't err by not addressing unrelated issues during reassessment. Unwarranted action.

September 11, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving a revision u/s 263 regarding the validity of a Limited scrutiny Assessment. The PCIT observed that the AO did not...

The High Court quashed the reassessment proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, holding it to be a case of "change of opinion" and...

The assessee dealt with a penny stock, and the Assessing Officer (AO) failed to conduct proper inquiry during reassessment proceedings. The Principal Commissioner of...

Issue of reassessment u/s 263, where the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) upheld the reassessment as erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue's interest for verification...

CIT invoked revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 alleging AO did not examine provision for subcontracting expenses and refund claim during reassessment proceedings. Assessee...

Validity of reassessment order - Notice sent on wrong (old) E-mail ID - The petitioner company had two email addresses, one used until 2019 and another operational since...

Assessee surrendered income during survey u/s 133A as unaccounted professional receipts, which AO accepted as professional income taxable at normal rates. PCIT invoked...

Revision u/s 263 - the ld. PCIT had alleged that the ld. AO had not made any enquiry at all on the issue of long term borrowings and other current liabilities. It is not...

Revision u/s 263 - Addition u/s 68 - Assessee has discharged the onus on it; and twice the AO enquired about it and in the reassessment this issue has been thoroughly...

The Assessing Officer (AO) failed to conduct relevant inquiries regarding the shares held as penny stocks by the assessee in GCM Securities Ltd. The Principal...

Validity of an ex-parte revisionary order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act. The key points are: The PCIT passed...

Change of jurisdiction u/s 127 - As in the present case, the Assessing Officer rejected the objection regarding the jurisdiction and referred the matter to the PCIT to...

The HC quashed reassessment proceedings for AY 2016-17 initiated via notice u/s 148 issued on July 29, 2022. The Court found that since the reassessment action commenced...

PCIT issued revision notice under s263 based on audit objections regarding unexplained property investments and bank deposits. The second notice dated 17.2.2022...

The High Court held that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) lacked jurisdiction to pass an order u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act in this case. The Assessing...

Quick Updates: