Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2012 Year 2012 This

Classification - Import of Long Pepper - differential duty – ...


Long Pepper Import Case: No Misdeclaration Found, No Penalty Imposed on Importers for 'Pippali' Description in Bills of Entry.

September 20, 2012

Case Laws     Customs     AT

Classification - Import of Long Pepper - differential duty – description of 'Long Pepper' as 'Pippali' by these appellants in the Bills of Entry would not amount to ‘misdeclaration’ - no penalty - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Recovery of differential duty (SAD) u/s 28(1) of CA for the imports made in all the Bills of Entry along with interest and penalties - The Tribunal confirmed the...

  2. Penalty u/s112(a), 112(b) & 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - fraudulent import of vehicles declared as brand new vehicles of foreign origin - the proceeding is hit by...

  3. Levy of penalty for abetting in mis-declaration of imported goods - Revocation of Courier License - The tribunal ruled that penalty under this section could only be...

  4. Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

  5. The CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed misdeclaration and undervaluation of imported goods, specifically modems and automated teller machine processors. The...

  6. Release of absolutely Confiscated Imported goods - levy of penalty - Canadian Green Peas - looking into the facts of the case that the appellant is a regular importer;...

  7. The case pertains to the import of restricted goods, specifically marbles and mosaics, under the Import Policy at a value lower than the Minimum Import Price notified by...

  8. Appellant, a Customs House Agent (CHA), was exonerated from penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act. CESTAT held no evidence of appellant's abetment in misdeclaration of...

  9. Levy of Penalty u/s 112 - Scope of the show cause notice - The CESTAT noted that, no show cause notice has been issued proposing the demand of differential duty or the...

  10. Classification of a product - long pepper/pippali - appellant classified their product under CTH 12119099 whereas the department proposed its classification under...

  11. Misdeclaration of imported polished marble slabs as unpolished slabs. Excess quantity found during physical verification. Customs duty demanded along with interest and...

  12. Non-fulfilment of export obligation under Advance Authorization by importer company. Penalty imposed on directors solely based on their shareholding and directorship,...

  13. Imposition of penalty under Section 78 - Merely because penalty under Section 78 has been imposed for the earlier period, no penalty can be imposed for any subsequent...

  14. The key points are: misdeclaration of goods by the importer cannot render the Customs House Agent (CHA) vicariously liable for penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act 1962....

  15. Import of gold bars - Other than Nominated agency - utilization of imported gold in manufacture and export the same - the appellant has imported goods as a Normal...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates