Oppression and mismanagement - illegal transfer of shares - this ...

Tribunal Waives Shareholding Requirement in Oppression Case, Allows Petition on Illegal Share Transfers to Proceed.

October 5, 2020

Case Laws Companies Law Tri

Oppression and mismanagement - illegal transfer of shares - this Tribunal is exercising its ample powers to waive the requisite shareholding percentage in order to maintain this petition even without filing a waiver application. - In spite of rescuing the Respondent Company in critical times, the petitioners were made to run from pillar to post to get their rightful share transfers as agreed to by the Respondent Nos. 2 to 8 which was clearly documented in various meetings and letters from joint Managing Director of the Company. Therefore, this Petition is hereby allowed. - Tri

View Source

← Previous Next →

Oppression and mismanagement - illegal transfer of shares - this ...

Tribunal Waives Shareholding Requirement in Oppression Case, Allows Petition on Illegal Share Transfers to Proceed.

October 5, 2020

Case Laws Companies Law Tri

You may also like:

Oppression and mismanagement - reduction in shareholding - illegal transfer and allotment of shares - The NCLAT observed that, the appellants did not fully comply with...

The Tribunal has the authority to order the purchase of shares by the company from any member u/s 242(2)(b) of the Companies Act, 2013, in cases of oppression and...

The NCLAT upheld the NCLT's decision to refuse waiver u/ss 244(1)(a) and (b) of the Companies Act 2013 to the Appellants, who held only 5.83% shareholding, to file an...

Deduction u/s. 35D - shares may have been allotted only to selected Qualified Institutional Buyers ("QIBs") - These regulations provide that when a company has a public...

The case involves the interpretation of u/s 55(2)(b)(i) and u/s 55(2)(aa)(B)(iiia) of the Income Tax Act regarding the cost of acquisition of bonus shares. The Tribunal...

The Tribunal held that the workings provided by the Department for determining the fair market value (FMV) of shares at Rs. 131.86 per share were not in accordance with...

The Company Tribunal held that Respondent No. 1 company is not a quasi-partnership due to lack of equality in shareholding since 1997 and failure to establish grounds...

Oppression and mismanagement - Directors were under a responsibility to disclose to all the shareholders that further shares are to be issued and such of them as were...

Oppression and mismanagement - the observations made by the Tribunal that the Respondents had been removed from the Board and their shareholding had been cancelled...

Oppression and Mismanagement - Transfer of Shares - allotment of shares - Forum Shopping - It is clear that even as on 1998, there was no business conducted by the...

Oppression and mismanagement - member - When the Respondent No.1 being a shareholder with 25% shareholding at the time of incorporation and also being one of the...

The SC held that the reduction in share capital of the subsidiary company and subsequent proportionate reduction in the shareholding of the assessee would be covered...

The assessee, a professional stock broker, claimed loss on trading of shares which was disallowed by the Assessing Officer (AO) on the grounds that the trades were not...

Assessee followed joint venture model for sharing revenue with collaborators as per franchise agreement. Assessee recorded all revenues, incurred expenditure, and shared...

Acquisition of shares accounted for 16.77% of the total shareholding - The case of all the appellants in this regard is that they had not “acquired” shares. - They...

Quick Updates: