Maintainability of appeal - The ROM rejection order does not ...

Appeal Against ROM Rejection Not Maintainable; Original Advance Ruling Order Stands Unchanged Under CGST Act, Section 100.

October 21, 2020

Case Laws GST AAAR

Maintainability of appeal - The ROM rejection order does not merge with the original advance ruling order. The original advance ruling stands without any corrections. The appeal should have been filed by the Appellant against the advance ruling order dated 21-09-2019 within the period of 30 days from the date of communication of the said order. - Appeal against ROM is not maintainable in as much as the impugned order is not an appealable order under Section 100 of the CGST Act, 2017 - AAAR

View Source

← Previous Next →

Maintainability of appeal - The ROM rejection order does not ...

Appeal Against ROM Rejection Not Maintainable; Original Advance Ruling Order Stands Unchanged Under CGST Act, Section 100.

October 21, 2020

Case Laws GST AAAR

You may also like:

Appeal against the rejection of application for Rectification of mistake (ROM) by the AAR - The appeal filed against the ROM order is not maintainable in as much as the...

The Larger Bench held that an appeal against an order passed u/s 142(6) of the CGST Act, 2017 is maintainable before the CESTAT. The Tribunal, citing a precedent...

The original authority had dispatched only one order in original and not the four orders in original to the appellants - one appeal filed by the appellant before...

Advance tax payment obligation does not apply when assessee claims agricultural land sale proceeds are exempt u/s 2(14). CIT(Appeals) should admit appeal for...

The HC quashed the cancellation of GST registration and rejection of revocation application, finding that respondents failed to provide valid justification for the...

Validity of assessment order - refund of BES - When the grounds for considering the appeal was the pendency of the appeal before the Tribunal, the Order of the...

Manual filing of applications for Advance Ruling and appeals before Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling

Advance Ruling application maintainable for recipient liable to pay tax on reverse charge basis, despite definition of 'advance ruling' - Section 95 to be interpreted...

The AAAR held that the time limit for passing an order u/s 101 of the CGST Act, 2017 is not mandatory, and the word 'shall' should be interpreted in an advisory manner...

Time Limitation - appeal stands filed after the normal period of three months provided for filing an appeal as also even after the extended period of three months for...

AAAR upheld rejection of advance ruling application filed by appellant on 28.06.2022 regarding taxability of fees collected. Prior investigation by DGGI commenced with...

One appeal filed by the Revenue against 7 Bills of Entry is not maintainable. As per Rule 6(A) of the CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982, when the Commissioner (Appeals)...

The central issue revolves around the maintainability of a single appeal filed by the Revenue against multiple Bills of Entry. As per Rule 6(A) of the CESTAT Procedure...

The appellant was required to deposit a total fee of Rs. 20,000/- (Rs. 10,000/- CGST and Rs. 10,000/- HGST) as a statutory precondition for filing an appeal against the...

Petition maintainable despite previously filed appeal. Order passed in violation of principles of natural justice by not allowing petitioner to file reply within...

Quick Updates: