Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights December 2020 Year 2020 This

Reward to the informer - Duty evasion - Directions to the ...


Court Orders Committee to Assess Informer's Reward Petition on Duty Evasion Promptly, Following Legal and Policy Guidelines.

December 15, 2020

Case Laws     Central Excise     HC

Reward to the informer - Duty evasion - Directions to the respondents to constitute a committee so as to consider the case of the petitioner in a time-bound period - The representation will be decided by the concerned respondent authorities in accordance with law, rules, regulations and Government policies applicable to the facts of the case and on the basis of materials on record, as expeditiously as possible and practicable.- HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The High Court dismissed the petition filed by an informer seeking directions against private respondents (importers of luxury cars) and statutory authorities (Customs,...

  2. Validity of order passed u/s 144B - disregarding the stay granted by this court - In the assessment order, the Assessing Officer is referring to a letter stating that...

  3. Disciplinary proceedings against Chartered Accountant (CA) - Initiation of parallel proceedings - the Committee viewed that the appointment of the Respondent was made...

  4. The High Court examined the grievances of an assessee against the Assessment Officer's rejection of their claim for High-Pitch scrutiny assessment without providing...

  5. Revision u/s 263 - merger of the order - the entire issue of limited scrutiny, reasons for selection, the Bank accounts in questions were before the ld. Pr. CIT. On this...

  6. Refusal to rectify the assessment order passed under Rule 142 (5) of the C.G.S.T. Rules, 2017 - denial of the Input Tax Credit (ITC) - The High Court found merit in the...

  7. Deduction u/s 54 - It is settled law that when on an issue there is no jurisdictional High Court decision other Hon’ble High Court decision has to be followed by...

  8. Order of cancellation of registration passed by Assessing Officer upheld by dismissing appeal on limitation ground challenged for not providing opportunity of hearing...

  9. AO has passed the impugned order under section 220(2) without giving effect to the order of the CIT(A). It appears that the Assessing Officer has deliberately not passed...

  10. Period of limitation to pass assessment order in case of remand proceedings u/s 153 - An order of any Court means an order of any and every Court of the country. - The...

  11. The HC condoned a 597-day delay in filing an appeal under Section 246A. The appellant claimed they did not receive communication of the order as it was sent to an...

  12. The assessing officer (AO) is empowered u/s 275(1A) to revise the penalty order by giving a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee within six months from the...

  13. The Income Tax Settlement Commission passed an order charging interest u/ss 234A, 234B, and 234C of the Income Tax Act. The petitioners challenged the order's...

  14. The High Court held that for levying penalty u/s 271D for violation of Section 269SS, the Assessing Officer must record satisfaction that the provisions were violated....

  15. The High Court held that the Assessing Officer's failure to frame a draft assessment order and directly passing a final order was violative of the mandatory provisions...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates