Validity of action of the DGCEI to initiate investigation ...

Court Excludes Stay Order Period from Limitation Calculation for DGCEI Investigation u/s 73(1) of Finance Act.

December 17, 2020

Case Laws Service Tax HC

Validity of action of the DGCEI to initiate investigation against the Petitioner - Exclusion of period of stay from the period of limitation - The period between the 10th February, 2016 when the stay order was passed till the disposal of the review petition i.e. 4th December, 2020 would be excluded for the propose of computing limitation period for the issuance of Show Cause Notice under Section 73(1) of the Finance Act - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of action of the DGCEI to initiate investigation ...

Court Excludes Stay Order Period from Limitation Calculation for DGCEI Investigation u/s 73(1) of Finance Act.

December 17, 2020

Case Laws Service Tax HC

You may also like:

Levy of penalty - period of limitation for raising demand - the Tribunal has to first judge as to whether the case of the assessee is covered by proviso below...

HC determined that invoking extended limitation period under First Proviso to Section 73(1) of Finance Act 1994 was unjustified. Following P&B Pharmaceuticals and...

Extended period of limitation - demand of service tax with penalty - The provisions of section 73(4) of the Finance Act are not applicable because intention of the...

The court held that the extended period of limitation under the proviso to Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994 could not be invoked against the appellant as there was no...

Challenging the constitutional validity of the Electoral Bond Scheme “Electoral Bond Scheme” or “Scheme” - The Supreme Court held that, the Electoral Bond Scheme, the...

Levy of penalty - In the light of section 73(4) of Finance Act, 1994, which is the sole ground for denying recourse to section 73(3) of Finance Act, 1994, it is clear...

This case deals with the applicability of Special Additional Excise Duty (SAED) levied u/s 147 of the Finance Act, 2002, and Additional Duty of Excise (AED) levied as...

The key points are: Appropriation of Rs. 11,00,000 deposited under protest during investigation cannot be considered as acceptance of liability. The extended period of...

SVLDRS - Recovery of arrears of tax in terms of Section 124(1)(c) of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme Rules, 2019 in the Finance Act, 2019 -...

HC dismissed the appeal, finding no substantial question of law regarding invocation of the extended five-year limitation period under Section 73(1) of Finance Act, 1994....

Demand of service tax by way of statement in lieu of Show cause notice (SCN)- demand-cum-penalty - section 73 (1A) of Finance Act, 1994 is not invokable and the...

The High Court examined the validity of Notification No. 56/2023-CT dated 28.12.2023, which extended the time limit for passing orders u/s 73 of the Central Goods and...

HC quashed the impugned order dated 30.12.2023 due to procedural non-compliance with Section 73 of AGST Act, 2017. The authority failed to issue a proper Show Cause...

The HC quashed the impugned order dated 14.12.2023 for violation of principles of natural justice. The respondent failed to issue a proper and prior show cause notice...

HC invalidated tax determination order due to procedural non-compliance with AGST Act 2017. Authority failed to issue proper Show Cause Notice (SCN) under Section 73(1),...

Quick Updates: