Revision u/s 263 - Unexplained cash investment u/s 69 - PCIT has ...

Case Laws Income Tax

December 31, 2020

Revision u/s 263 - Unexplained cash investment u/s 69 - PCIT has no right to review the order which was subject matter of appeal before Ld. CIT(A) and we notice that the issue which is challenged before Ld. CIT(A) is the same issue in which Ld. PCIT has reviewed u/s 263 - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 - Unexplained cash investment u/s 69 - PCIT has ...

Case Laws Income Tax

December 31, 2020

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 - if the enquiry of such unexplained investment is not done then same would be erroneous order prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue u/s 263 - thus...

Revision u/s 263 - unexplained cash deposit during the demonization period - The tribunal noted that the AO had conducted an adequate inquiry into the assessee's cash...

Unexplained investment/unexplained cash credit under section 68 & 69 - no addition is called for on account of baseless allegation of unexplained investment by the...

Unsecured loan u/s 68 - Bogus cash credits - where there is a statutory rebuttable presumption against the assessee, as in case of cash credits etc., u/s 68 or...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - PCIT has not disputed the nature of the investments being strategic investment made for the purpose and in course of the business of the...

Revision u/s 263 - Unexplained cash deposits - Merely because documents, noted by the AO to be produced by the creditor of source of cash deposit in response to summons...

The Commissioner's invocation of Section 263 for revision of the assessment order was unjustified as the twin conditions of the order being erroneous and prejudicial to...

Addition u/s 69 - Unexplained investment or not - only when the investment is not recorded in the books of accounts or the explanation by the assessee regarding the...

Unexplained investment u/s 69 - The aspect that this income was not declared in the original return of income cannot be a ground to automatically conclude that it is...

Unexplained investment u/s 69 – Assessee paid up additional stamp duty on valuation - This by itself would not mean that the assessee made any unexplained investment - HC

Revision u/s 263 - the ld PCIT had invoked revision jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Act on the very same point of allowability of LTCL. Hence it could be safely concluded...

Unexplained investment u/s 69 - The tribunal closely examined the additions made under Section 69 related to unexplained investments in stock. The assessees argued that...

Validity of Revision u/s 263 - PCIT was of the view that the cash withdrawn was utilised to purchase inventory - if the AO did not bring to tax the amount which was...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - the assessee had duly explained as to why certain receipts though subjected to TDS, would not be liable to be offered to tax such as...

The case pertains to the revision of an assessment order u/s 263 regarding the applicability of the higher tax rate u/s 115BBE on unexplained expenditure u/s 69C. The...

Quick Updates: