Revision u/s 263 by CIT - A reading of the same clearly shows ...

PCIT's Revision u/s 263 Overturned Due to Lack of Error in Original Assessment Order; Notice u/s 143(2) Invalid.

July 23, 2022

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - A reading of the same clearly shows that after having made a contradictory observation on issue of lack of enquiry of cash deposit aspect for which the assessment was taken up, the ld. PCIT went on virtually issue a notice u/s 143(2) and embark upon fishing and roving expedition. PCIT never mentioned in his order before issuing this second notice as to how the Assessment Order in this regard was erroneous so as to be prejudicial to the interest of the revenue. Hence, this part of the ld. PCIT’s order wherein notice was issued dehors any finding or even mention of the AO’s order being erroneous or prejudicial to the interest of the revenue is not at all sustainable. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - A reading of the same clearly shows ...

PCIT's Revision u/s 263 Overturned Due to Lack of Error in Original Assessment Order; Notice u/s 143(2) Invalid.

July 23, 2022

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 against non-Est order - The ITAT held that, return filed beyond the prescribed time limit under notice u/s 148 should not be treated as non-est. -...

Revision u/s 263 - Being conscious of the fact that the original assessment order could not be revised under section 263 of the Act due to bar of limitation, as provided...

The assessee's case was selected for limited scrutiny under CASS. The PCIT observed that the assessee, along with two co-owners, had purchased an immovable property...

ITAT ruled against Principal CIT's revision under Section 263, finding the order procedurally flawed. The tribunal held that PCIT cannot delegate verification...

Assessee surrendered income during survey u/s 133A as unaccounted professional receipts, which AO accepted as professional income taxable at normal rates. PCIT invoked...

The Appellate Tribunal reviewed a case involving a revision u/s 263 related to deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i). The AO allowed interest income from FD investments as a...

The ITAT held that the limitation period for issuing a notice u/s 143(2) is relevant to the financial year and assessment year. When the Assessing Officer considered the...

Revision u/s 263 - Period of limitation - To be commenced from original assessment order or re-assessment order u/s 147 - In the case on hand, the jurisdiction under...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT-A - Jurisdiction of AO - invalid notice u/s 143(2) - The issuance of notice u/s 143(2) is governed by statutorily prescribed procedures. On a...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Jurisdiction exercised by ld PCIT under section 263 of the Act is not in accordance with law. PCIT has selected the item (share capital and...

Revision u/s 263 - Validity of order passed by the A.O. u/s.143(3) questioned - when the impugned order of reassessment u/s 143(3), in itself had been passed on the...

Revision u/s 263 - period of limitation - the case was re-assessed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 147 - the case of the assessee was again reopened and the assessment u/s. 143(3)...

Invocation of Section 263 by the Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax (PCIT), alleging non-application of mind and lack of jurisdiction. The key points are: The...

Notice u/s 143(2) issued by a non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer/Deputy Commissioner is invalid and cannot be cured. The assessment order framed u/s 143(3) based on...

Revision u/s 263 - the notice u/s. 143(2) of the Act, was issued much prior to the assessee filing his return of income. This is not in accordance with law. Hence the...

Quick Updates: