The ITAT Jaipur addressed a case involving a revision u/s 263 ...

Revision u/s 263 - PCIT's order not erroneous or prejudicial - AO's decision upheld

Case Laws Income Tax

June 5, 2024

The ITAT Jaipur addressed a case involving a revision u/s 263 concerning the addition u/s 68 based on a report from an investigation in Mumbai. The PCIT contended that the AO did not properly examine the issue of bogus LTCG, leading to the need for the LTCG claimed to be added to the assessee's total income. The tribunal emphasized that for u/s 263 to apply, the assessment order must be both erroneous and prejudicial to revenue. Mere loss of revenue due to the AO's decision does not automatically make the order prejudicial. The tribunal found no incorrectness in the AO's actions and concluded that the PCIT's order did not meet the requirements of u/s 263. The tribunal held that a change of opinion by the PCIT is not permissible under the law, ultimately allowing the assessee's appeal.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ITAT Jaipur addressed a case involving a revision u/s 263 ...

Revision u/s 263 - PCIT's order not erroneous or prejudicial - AO's decision upheld

Case Laws Income Tax

June 5, 2024

You may also like:

The ITAT upheld the Revision u/s 263 by PCIT, finding the AO's assessment under section 143(3) r.w.s. 153C erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue. The unsigned assessment...

The Commissioner's invocation of Section 263 for revision of the assessment order was unjustified as the twin conditions of the order being erroneous and prejudicial to...

The assessee, a university, claimed exemption u/s 10(23C)(iiiab) for the relevant assessment year, which was accepted by the Assessing Officer (AO) after considering the...

AO failed to conduct proper inquiries regarding genuineness of loan transactions for property acquisition. Bank statements revealed assessee lacked funds, payments made...

Validity of revision proceedings u/s 263 - Adoption of either of view by AO - allowability under section 36(1)(viia) - The court concludes that the original assessment...

Revision u/s 263 - AO on merits has allowed the case u/s 54F of the Act in accordance with law. This cannot be a case for revision u/s 263 - A decision of the AO could...

The case pertains to the revision of an assessment order u/s 263 regarding the applicability of the higher tax rate u/s 115BBE on unexplained expenditure u/s 69C. The...

Revision u/s 263 - valuation of the cost of construction for hospital building - as per explanation u/s 263, the AO did not discharge his liability fully. First the AO...

Issue of reassessment u/s 263, where the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) upheld the reassessment as erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue's interest for verification...

Revision u/s 263 - unexplained cash deposit during the demonization period - The tribunal noted that the AO had conducted an adequate inquiry into the assessee's cash...

The ITAT addressed a case involving revision u/s 263 where the main allegation was the non-disclosure of agricultural income affecting the deduction u/s 54B. The...

Revision u/s 263 - tds credit issue non examination by AO - non examination of an issue by the AO renders the assessment erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the revenue

Revision u/s 263 - as per CIT-A interest on SBI constitute other income which was not properly verified by the AO - The present revision is on difference of opinion...

Revision u/s 263 - unexplained cash deposits - onus to prove - The Pr. CIT found the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue's interests due to...

Revision u/s 263 - The ITAT held that the AO had conducted adequate inquiries into the sales promotion expenses, as evidenced by the issuance of specific queries to the...

Quick Updates: