Revision u/s 263 - Clearly, what was being directed by the ...

Case Laws Income Tax

December 31, 2020

Revision u/s 263 - Clearly, what was being directed by the learned Commissioner was already done by the Assessing Officer, and, therefore, these directions clearly show that there was a clear and glaring non- application of mind to even undisputed material facts of the case. We, therefore, cannot approve justification of the subject assessment order being held to be ‘erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the revenue’ for this reason as well. No other reason is pointed out to us. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 - Clearly, what was being directed by the ...

Case Laws Income Tax

December 31, 2020

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 - assessment order as contrary to the draft assessment order - The remedy against unjust disallowances, on merits, lies in the appellate process and not...

Revision u/s 263 - addition u/s 68 - The Assessing Officer has taken a possible view. When the Assessing Officer follows the direction of the Ld. Pr. CIT, in his order...

Revision u/s 263 - CIT has merely directed the Assessing Officer to make an elaborate inquiry. - revision is not valid - AT

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - receipt of share premium - the power of revision u/s 263 does not allow for supplanting or substituting the view of the Assessing Officer. The...

The Appellate Tribunal held that the issues on which the reassessment order was passed u/s 147 read with Section 143(3) and the issues on which the revision order was...

Revision u/s 263 - bogus purchase - proof of nexus between the purchases and sales - once submission/reply filed by the assessee, pursuant to enquiry by the Assessing...

Revision u/s 263 - Once the valuation report has not been sent by the valuation officer to the assessing officer/assessee, within the period stipulated by the act that...

Revision u/s 263 on Insurance business - in the original assessment the Assessing Officer has clearly segregated the Shareholders Account and Policyholders Account and...

Revision u/sec. 263 - CIT has exceeded his jurisdiction in directing the Assessing Officer to initiate penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - AT

Revision u/s 263 - Validity of proceedings – CIT has no jurisdiction to direct the Assessing Officer to initiate proceedings u/s 201(1A) - AT

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The Appellate Tribunal found that the PCIT's assumption of jurisdiction under Section 263 was not justified. It observed that the assessment...

Revision u/s 263 - ‘business income’ OR ‘agricultural income’ - In the present case, neither any enquiry has been made by the Assessing Officer nor any questions were...

Revision u/s 263 - When the Assessing Officer after exhaustive deliberations had accepted the explanation of the assessee and refrained from drawing any adverse...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Whether waiver of loan has been held to be capital receipt - the basis for assuming jurisdiction u/s. 263 of the Act is Note II to Schedule...

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeal regarding the revision u/s 263 concerning unsecured loans received. The Principal Commissioner found that the...

Quick Updates: