Service of Demand Notice - Detention/Confiscation of goods - ...

Court Rules Confiscation Invalid Under GST Act Sec. 130(4) for Lack of Hearing Opportunity for Conveyance Owner.

January 4, 2021

Case Laws GST HC

Service of Demand Notice - Detention/Confiscation of goods - opportunity of being heard is to be given to both the owner of the goods as also the owner of the conveyance. In the present case, we do not find any notice affording opportunity of hearing to the owner of the conveyance. As such the impugned order of confiscation would be in violation of Section 130(4) of the GST Act. The order of confiscation would be without affording due opportunity of hearing. - Matter restored back - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Service of Demand Notice - Detention/Confiscation of goods - ...

Court Rules Confiscation Invalid Under GST Act Sec. 130(4) for Lack of Hearing Opportunity for Conveyance Owner.

January 4, 2021

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

The High Court quashed refund rejection orders for lack of opportunity for personal hearing as mandated by Rule 92(3) of CGST Rules, 2017, violating principles of...

Opportunity to be heard to ICA Lenders not provided - ‘person concerned’ - the NCLT has denied an opportunity to be heard to ICA Lenders on the ground that insofar as...

Interpretation of statute - word ‘or’ is used in section 75(4) of the UPGST Act, 2017 - opportunity of personal hearing was not afforded - Relying on statutory...

HC upheld confiscation notice issued under Section 130 of TNGST Act regarding transport of gold jewelry. Officials established prima facie evidence of tax evasion...

HC upheld validity of Rule 36(4) of CGST Rules, dismissing constitutional challenge. Court determined Rule 36(4) derives authority from Section 16 of CGST Act and...

The Madras High Court considered the issue of personal hearing notice u/s FEMA 1999. The Court held that Rule 4(3) does not require the reasoned opinion to be...

The High Court examined whether proper show cause notices were issued before passing impugned orders u/s 73(9) of the State GST Act. It held that the summary of show...

The adjudicating authority is bound to explain the alleged contraventions to the person proceeded against or their legal representatives. Rule 4(4) mandates...

The HC held that an officer appointed under Section 6 of the Karnataka GST Act qualifies as a proper officer under Section 4 of the IGST Act through cross-empowerment...

The Calcutta High Court found a violation of principles of natural justice as the impugned order was passed without giving the petitioners an opportunity of hearing as...

The Allahabad High Court addressed the denial of a personal hearing in a tax assessment case, emphasizing the mandatory nature of such hearings u/s 75(4) of the U.P. GST...

Recovery notices and bank attachment orders - No opportunity of being heard - discrepancies between the GSTR 3B return and the GSTR 2B return - The High Court observed...

Ex-parte order - Quantification of Liability - intention of evade GST - improper accounting of goods - The High court agrees with the petitioner's contention regarding...

Rejection of refund claim - opportunity of hearing not provided - As per Rule 92 (3) of CGST Rules, 2017, the provision is very clear that any application for refund...

The petition raised issues regarding the maintainability of the appeal u/s 107 of the UPGST Act, 2017, violation of Section 75(4) of the Act, and denial of opportunity...

Quick Updates: