Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights January 2021 Year 2021 This

Addition u/s 68 - CIT(A) accepts that these companies actually ...


CIT(A) Confirms Companies' Existence and Investment Capacity; No Additions u/s 68 After Successful Proof by Assessee.

January 20, 2021

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Addition u/s 68 - CIT(A) accepts that these companies actually exist and have capacity to make investments in assessee company as it was proved in the case of the investigation at Ahmedabad and Baroda. The CIT(A) also observed that the assessee has discharged his onus of burden of proof in respect of identity of investor, creditworthiness and genuineness of the transaction. - No additions - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. CIT(A) power of enhancement u/s 250 and 251 - change of section - Addition u/s 68 v/s 69A - CIT(A) has applied and confirmed the impugned addition u/s 69A as against...

  2. Protective assessment - Addition u/s 69/69C - Unaccounted investment ad unaccounted commission - CIT(A) has confirmed the substantive additions on the three entities so...

  3. The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions u/ss 69C and 68 for undisclosed credit card expenditures in foreign currencies based on material found during a survey. The...

  4. Addition u/s 68 - Once addition is made in the hands of the investor company for this reason that the source could not be explained by the investor company, it cannot be...

  5. Addition u/s. 68 - satisfaction regarding the identity and creditworthiness of the 13 investors who have invested in the share capital of the assessee company and the...

  6. Unexplained Income - addition u/s 68 - Receipt of share application money from group companies - group companies invest in each other - Double additions - In this case...

  7. Unexplained cash credit - addition u/s 68 - - CIT(Appeals) has held that it is for the businessman to decide how it wants to use its funds. The subscribers have not...

  8. Addition u/s 68 - The CIT(A) has observed that the transactions was part of the turnover/sale, whereas the addition has been made under Section 68 of the Act without...

  9. Addition u/s 68 - one of director of company admitted that the entire investment was bogus - Blank receipts after cash deposit were obtained from the share holders -...

  10. Addition u/s 68 by the AO - CIT(A) confirmed the additions u/s 69 - The provisions of Section 292B of the I.T. Act, 1961 are not applicable because there is no mistake,...

  11. Bogus LTCG - addition u/s 68 - the assessee is a habitual investor having portfolio of investment in shares in crores and is still holding investment in shares in...

  12. Addition u/s 68 - CIT-A deleted the entire additions on the basis of few sample shareholders - AO has also not given the breakup of the investment made by the 10 persons...

  13. The ITAT ruled on the addition u/s 68 of share capital/premium from three dummy entities related to RPS Group. The addition was substantive for RPS Group and protective...

  14. Share application money - additions u/s 68 - Other than the share application forms, no other agreement between the respondent and third companies had been placed on...

  15. The assessee successfully discharged the onus u/s 68 regarding share capital introduced by the company director, a major shareholder, proving identity, creditworthiness,...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates