Refund – unjust enrichment - upheld the order of refund on the ...

Case Laws Central Excise

September 28, 2012

Refund – unjust enrichment - upheld the order of refund on the ground that there is no variation in the price of the product both before and after the period the duty was paid by the assessee - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund – unjust enrichment - upheld the order of refund on the ...

Case Laws Central Excise

September 28, 2012

You may also like:

Refund including cash refund of DEPB/FPS scrips - principles of unjust enrichment - The Tribunal examined the facts surrounding the refund claims and acknowledged the...

Refund - valuation - price variation clause in the rate contract - excess payment of duty due to downward revision in the price / rate – unjust enrichment - refund allowed - AT

Refund claims – unjust enrichment – service tax paid under protest – refund allowed - AT

Refund of excess tax / duty paid - downward price revision based on the negative supplementary invoices - The assessee has furnished the supplementary invoices for the...

Show cause notice demanding interest was confirmed by the original Adjudicating Authority and settled under SVLDRS Scheme, thus refund of the confirmed amount does not...

Recovery of erroneous Refund of interest on delayed payment of differential duty - price variation clause - Rejection on the ground that since the appellant was liable...

Refund of excess duty paid - price variation clause - where it was held that where there is price variation clause and the prices have been reduced subsequent to...

Refund claim - Unjust enrichment - price inclusive of duty of excise - maintaining uniformity of price - duty paid under protest - refund allowed - HC

The appellant filed bills of entry claiming exemption under Notification No. 46/2011-Cus, which was denied during re-assessment. The Commissioner (Appeals) rectified...

Refund claim - reduction of price subsequent to clearance of the goods - Refund claim rejected - price variation clause itself is not a ground to consider the assessment...

The CESTAT examined the applicability of the doctrine of unjust enrichment u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, for refund claims. It held that Rule 6(3) of the CCR...

Refund - principles of unjust enrichment - the unjust enrichment is not applicable even when the refund amount is claimed as expenses in the Profit and Loss Account.

Refund claim - Cess - unjust enrichment - The amount realized from the foreign buyer was only FOB value - the refund of cess is not hit by unjust enrichment

Unjust enrichment - refund claim - bar of unjust enrichment not applicable to imported capital goods used captively by the importer - refund cannot be denied.

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Merely because it was shown as expenditure, the department cannot contend that pre-deposit made by appellant is hit by unjust...

Quick Updates: