Seeking reimbursement / refund of “Amount paid twice” - The ...

Court Rules Against State Using Limitations Defense for Duplicate Payments; Refund Claim Not Under Customs Act Section 19.

February 12, 2021

Case Laws Customs HC

Seeking reimbursement / refund of “Amount paid twice” - The State is not expected to get itself unduly enriched by erroneous or forced or inadvertent payments of money made by its citizens. The State is not expected to bring in defence of limitation in respect of such payments resulting in unjust enrichment. The claim of the petitioner for refund of the dual payment, in the circumstances, would not fall within the ambit of Section 19 of the Customs Act. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Seeking reimbursement / refund of “Amount paid twice” - The ...

Court Rules Against State Using Limitations Defense for Duplicate Payments; Refund Claim Not Under Customs Act Section 19.

February 12, 2021

Case Laws Customs HC

You may also like:

The case concerns the time limit for filing a refund claim of Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid by an importer. The issue is whether the one-year limitation specified...

HC allowed the petition challenging the refund claim rejection. The court found that the respondent improperly rejected the refund application in GST RFD-03 by stating...

Refund of Customs Duty - Period of limitation - the order of this Tribunal dated 03.03.2011 was challenged by the Revenue before the Hon’ble High Court and before the...

Refund of Additional Duty of Customs paid - to allow the limitation period to start from the date of payment of duty as prescribed under the amended notification, would...

Refund claim was rejected as time-barred, having been filed beyond the one-year limitation period stipulated u/s 27 of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellant had...

Refund claim of Special Additional Duty (SAD), under Customs Act, in lieu of sales tax - rejection on the ground of time limitation - The Hon’ble High Court has clearly...

Applicability of the time period (limitation) to claim refund of Special Additional Duty (SAD) - Merely because Section 27 of the Customs Act provides for a period of...

Refund of accumulated CENVAT Credit - time limitation - one year limitation as provided in Section 11B is applicable for claiming refund under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules.

The High Court allowed the petition and quashed the impugned order rejecting the petitioner's refund application for unutilized input tax credit. The court held that the...

Refund of Cenvat credit - Rule 5 – Power of Additional Commissioner to adjudicate refund claim - AT

The High Court held that since the nature of supply was intra-state in respective states, the tax liability shall be discharged individually in each state equivalent to...

Refund claim of service tax paid on cancelled transactions - Post GST era - Rejection of refund under Rule 6(3) of Service Tax Rules read with Sec 142(5) of CGST Act -...

Refund of SAD - time limitation - Though the issue of limitation is not applicable to the present refund claims and the refund claim of SAD cannot be held to be barred...

The Supreme Court ruled on the refund of Stamp Duty for an un-executed conveyance deed u/s 47 (c) of the Act and Rules 21, 22A of Bombay Stamp Rules, 1939. The appellant...

Refund of CENVAT Credit - time limitation - Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules itself clearly specifying that such refund claims would be subject to “such safeguards,...

Quick Updates: