Levy of penalty u/s 221 - Error / Mentioning of wrong AY in the ...

Court Rules Error in Penalty Order Not Covered by Section 292B; Financial Incapacity Considered in Decision.

February 15, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Levy of penalty u/s 221 - Error / Mentioning of wrong AY in the penalty order - Financial incapacity of an assessee to pay the tax - Year of assessment - The aforesaid mistake, if any, is not same under Section 292B of the Act under which only clerical error or accidental omissions can be protected. Therefore, the decisions on which reliance has been placed by the learned counsel for the revenue, has no application to the factual matrix of the case. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty u/s 221 - Error / Mentioning of wrong AY in the ...

Court Rules Error in Penalty Order Not Covered by Section 292B; Financial Incapacity Considered in Decision.

February 15, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

This case deals with the levy of deficit stamp duty and penalty in a court-conducted auction sale. The key points are: In a court-supervised auction sale, the stamp...

The High Court held that respondent No. 3 cannot avoid deciding the petitioners' application dated 20 December 2023 seeking an advance ruling on the taxability of sale...

The High Court considered the maintainability of a writ petition seeking a writ of prohibition despite the petitioner not challenging the allegedly erroneous orders. The...

The High Court addressed the issue of Tax Deducted at Source u/s 195 and addition u/s 40(a)(ia) for payments made to non-residents. The court examined the scope of...

Doctrine of Merger of High Court Decision with the Order of Supreme Court - The Jharkhand High Court, in its analysis, delved into the doctrine of merger, a pivotal...

The High Court address the rejection of revision petition u/s 264 due to an inadvertent error in filing Form ITR-VII, resulting in denial of exemption to a trust...

The High Court rejected the petition challenging SEBI's decision to not accept the settlement applications. The petitioner's documents were deficient, and it failed to...

Refund of service tax on Ocean Freight - Precedents - Validity of order of CESTAT for non-following the decision of Non-Jurisdictional High Court, in regard to...

The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, holding that contributions made to the unrecognized provident fund and unapproved pension fund were eligible for deduction under...

The doctrine of prospective overruling is applied when a constitutional court overrules a well-established precedent by declaring a new rule but limits its application...

Deduction u/s 54 - It is settled law that when on an issue there is no jurisdictional High Court decision other Hon’ble High Court decision has to be followed by...

The court granted custodial bail to the accused, who had no criminal antecedents, in a case involving illegal mining and revenue loss. The accused filed a petition...

SC ruled on a contract dispute involving a bidding error where appellant mistakenly bid Rs.1,569 instead of Rs.15,04,64,000. While acknowledging appellant's error in...

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the Explanations to Rule 38 of the Mineral (Other than Atomic and Hydrocarbons Energy Minerals) Concession Rules, 2016 and Rule...

The court held that the revenue authorities cannot question the decision of the Development Commissioner regarding bunching of products for domestic tariff area (DTA)...

Quick Updates: