Disallowance of advertising expenditure - the deletion of the ...

Case Laws Income Tax

April 7, 2021

Disallowance of advertising expenditure - the deletion of the addition made by the A.O. qua expenditure incurred on advertising both by the CIT(A) and the Tribunal, to our minds, was in order. The extent of expenditure on advertising does not, in our view, decide as to whether the expenditure incurred is of a revenue nature or of a capital nature. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Disallowance of advertising expenditure - the deletion of the ...

Case Laws Income Tax

April 7, 2021

You may also like:

Disallowance u/s 14A - Disallowance made on account of interest expenditure - AO has not made any disallowance on account of interest expenditure u/s 14A of the I.T. Act...

Disallowance of an expenditure incurred representing the interest paid - case was selected for limited scrutiny on different issues - A.O. has not made any...

ITAT dealt with the addition of notional interest on interest-free advances and disallowance of inflated import purchases. Assessee's advances to brokers were assigned...

The assessee denied the entries representing unaccounted cash expenditure, stating they were merely MIS reports for discussion purposes, containing approximate project...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - when we examine penalty levied on account of salary disallowance AO has merely made adhoc addition by way of guess work and the AO has not...

Addition on the basis of declaration made by assessee during a search action u/s 132 - The ITAT found no merit in the revenue's arguments, noting that the addition was...

Disallowance u/s 14A - Mandation of recording satisfaction - suo motu disallowance made by assessee - where suo motu disallowance has been made, the Assessing Officer is...

Addition made u/s 69C - Unexplained huge expenditure to earn Agriculture income - once the assessee has not made any investment, the addition made u/s 69C of the Act is illegal.

Disallowance of Payment Labour Charges - addition made as payment is supported by self-made vouchers and have no signature of recipients - The Tribunal, based on a...

The ITAT held that the CIT (A) erred in admitting additional evidence without following Rule 46A. Deletion of additions on forfeited amount and various expenses was...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowances in the quantum assessment order - whether any concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars proved? - Tribunal directs...

In the present case, the Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed the expenditure claimed u/s 57(iii) of the Income Tax Act on an ad-hoc basis. The AO did not challenge the...

Disallowance of expenditure towards development of property - no supporting bills of expenditure were provided - CIT(A) has allowed on ad hoc basis only 40% of the...

The tribunal affirmed the decision of the CIT(A) to admit additional evidence under Rule 46A, leading to the deletion of disallowance on depreciation claims....

The Appellate Tribunal addressed three main issues raised by the Assessee against the assessment order. Firstly, regarding the disallowance of job work charges to a...

Quick Updates: