Refund claim redemption fine and penalty, since the demand was ...

Court Rejects Revenue's Objections: Refund Claim Accepted Despite 14-Year Delay and Lack of Documentation.

April 8, 2021

Case Laws Customs HC

Refund claim redemption fine and penalty, since the demand was set aside - Revenue contended that the claim is unsupported by documents - applicability of time limitation - refund claim is after 14 years of alleged deposit - All the contentions of the revenue rejected - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund claim redemption fine and penalty, since the demand was ...

Court Rejects Revenue's Objections: Refund Claim Accepted Despite 14-Year Delay and Lack of Documentation.

April 8, 2021

Case Laws Customs HC

You may also like:

Time limitation for filing refund claim is one year from relevant date as per Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944 made applicable to service tax under Finance Act,...

Delay in issuing Refund under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020 - interest on delayed refund - Despite the issuance of Form No. 5, the refunds for the Assessment...

Delayed adjudication of show cause notice without reasonable cause - Delay in finalizing assessments and issuing demand - Classification of goods under appropriate...

HC ruled against granting interest on delayed tax refund while upholding the refund claim itself. The respondent's application for condonation of delay, filed on...

Disallowance on account of foreign exchange fluctuation loss - It is an undisputed fact that for the assessment year 2012-13, 2013-14 and 2016-17, the assessee declared...

The High Court set aside the orders rejecting the petitioner's refund claims for excess tax paid in different assessment years on the ground of time limitation. The...

The High Court allowed the petition and quashed the impugned order rejecting the petitioner's refund application for unutilized input tax credit. The court held that the...

Condonation of delay in re-filing appeals by revenue rejected - Delay of three years - Delays by government departments due to impersonal official machinery not accepted...

Refund of claim - Claim filed beyond period of 1 year - Export - Notification No. 17/2009 - all conditions are mandatory - refund claim filed beyond one year rejected - AT

Notification 52/2003-Cus dated 31.03.2003 governs the re-import of goods after export. Sr. No. 14 allows re-import for repair/reconditioning within 3/7 years,...

CESTAT allowed appeal concerning export duty refund and interest payment on delayed refund. While appellant claimed provisional assessment, tribunal determined it was a...

Refund claim for service tax paid under reverse charge mechanism on transportation of raw material was rejected. The appellant had self-assessed and filed returns...

The Punjab and Haryana High Court addressed the issue of refund of excess Input Tax Credit (ITC) and entitlement to interest on delayed refund. The petitioner's...

Refund of excise duty paid erroneously - When the appellant realized that he has paid excess duty thereafter he filed the refund application under Section 11B of the...

The High Court refused to condone the delay of 4486 days in filing an appeal against a money recovery decree. The delay was inordinate, and the appellant, a limited...

Quick Updates: