Profiteering - Given the fact that two out of three entities ...

Case Laws GST

May 28, 2021

Profiteering - Given the fact that two out of three entities have, it appears, passed on a substantial amount qua the purported profiteered amount, to their customers, the respondents will not, for the moment, subject the petitioners to coercive measures. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Profiteering - Given the fact that two out of three entities ...

Case Laws GST

May 28, 2021

You may also like:

Profiteering - purchased a flat in the Respondent's project - allegation is that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) to him by way of...

Profiteering - purchase of Flats - it is alleged that Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed by way of commensurate reduction in the...

Profiteering - purchase of flat - Respondent directed to refund / repay both the profiteered amount @2.61% of the taxable amount (base price) and the GST on the said...

Profiteering - purchase of flats / shops - it is alleged that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of ITC to him by way of commensurate reduction in prices and...

Profiteering - supply of Services by way of admission to exhibition of cinematograph films where the price of admission ticket was one hundred rupees or less - despite...

Profiteering - supply of Services by way of admission to exhibition of cinematography films - benefit of reduction in the GST rate not passed on - the Respondent is...

Profiteering - supply of Services by way of admission to exhibition of cinematography films - There is no dispute relating to the fact that the Respondent has increased...

Disallowance of deduction u/s 80IB - Comparing profitability of two entities - as rightly noted by Ld. CIT(A), the profitability of the two entities could not be...

Profiteering - supply of “Snacks” - benefit of reduction in the rate of tax not passed on - Profiteering proceedings are only concerned with ascertaining whether the...

Profiteering - restaurant service - reduction in the GST rate not passed - The profiteered amount is determined as ₹ 78,41,754/- as has been computed in...

Reopening of assessment post amalgamation process - Mere activation of PAN number may not give a right to the revenue to issue notice to a non-existent entity....

AO has passed the impugned order under section 220(2) without giving effect to the order of the CIT(A). It appears that the Assessing Officer has deliberately not passed...

Revision u/s 263 - Addition u/s 68 - second revisional jurisdiction of Pr. CIT - Whether the AO (called second AO) has not conducted enquiry while framing re-assessment...

Profiteering - purchase of flats - benefit of Input Tax Credit had not been passed on to the Applicant - The Authority determined amount of Rs. 85,77,419/- (including...

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (SUBSTANTIAL ACQUISITION OF SHARES AND TAKEOVERS) (SECOND AMENDMENT) REGULATIONS, 2019

Quick Updates: