Right of bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C - offence u/s ...

Case Laws GST

June 5, 2021

Right of bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C - offence u/s 132(1)(b), 132(1)(c), 132(1)(1)(i) of CGST Act, 2017 - The statutory period as provided under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C i.e. 60 days had expired on 11.01.2021. The complaint/final report in this case were submitted before this court on 11.01.2021 itself. The application in hand has moved on 13.01.2021 i.e. 2 days after filing of the complaint/final report in the matter. - the contentions raised on behalf of the applicant are not covered under the provisions of 167(2) Cr.P.C. Consequently, the application is hereby dismissed. - DSC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Right of bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C - offence u/s ...

Case Laws GST

June 5, 2021

You may also like:

Grant of Anticipatory Bail - respondent had issued notice/summons u/s 70 of CGST - the petitioner has reasons to believe that he may be arrested on accusation for having...

Application seeking regular bail granted - accused allegedly formed bogus firms and evaded tax payments - offences u/ss 132(1)(b), 132(1)(c) and 132(1)(l)(l) of GST Act...

Grant of Default Bail - The default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. cannot be equated with the discretion of the Court under Sections 437, 438 or 439 Cr.P.C., wherein...

Bail Application - offences punishable under Sections 132(1)(b) and 132(1)(c) of CGST Act - The applicant is arrested on 21.07.2019 and almost 55 days are over and...

Seeking grant of Bail - illegal availment of input tax credits - True it is that offence committed under Section 132 (1) of the Act of 2017 is made compoundable under...

Bail granted - creation of fake firms, availing and utilizing ITC - offences u/ss 132(1)(b), 132(1)(c), and 132(5) of CGST Act, 2017 - allegations based on witness...

The High Court considered a case involving fraudulent availing and passing on of Input Tax Credit u/s 132(1)(b) & (c) and u/s 132(1)(i) of Central Goods & Service Tax...

Seeking grant of Bail - tax evasion - sham companies - offence u/s 132 - It is not disputed by the department that if the tax evasion of the applicant is less than Rs.5...

The High Court dismissed petitions u/s 91 Cr.P.C, 311 Cr.P.C, and 254(2) Cr.P.C by the accused in a cheque dishonor case. The court held that statutory presumptions can...

Grant of default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. - The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's and Special Court's orders granting default...

TP Adjustment - associated enterprise or not - it is evident that sub-Sections (1) and (2) of Section 92A of the Act are interlinked and have to be read together. In...

The jurisdictional Assessing Officer (AO) had suo moto transferred the assessment to Income Tax Officer (ITO), Ward 2(2) Noida. The appellant contended that the...

Transitional credit - revision of the Form TRAN-1 and Form TRAN-2 - The interest of justice would be served if we allow the petitioner to correct Form TRAN-1 in Writ...

Jurisdiction to entertain the complaint filed by the respondents - which class of Special Courts, created by Companies Act (amendment) 2017, is empowered to try the...

Validity of the order 278(2) - compounding of offence u/s 279(2) - Income Tax Authorities have the power to compound the offence either before or after the institution...

Quick Updates: