Home Highlights October 2012 Year 2012 This

You may also like:

1. Refund claim u/s 142(3) of CGST Act, 2017 read with Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1994 was partially allowed. Refund of Rs. 20,52,143/- and Rs. 2,19,004/- granted,...

2. Rejection of declared transaction value under Valuation Rule 12, re-determination of value under Valuation Rules 4-9. Commissioner followed Rule 9, adopted actual values...

3. Attachment of property while exercising the power to access the premises u/s 71(1) - The plain reading of Section 83 of the Act would indicate that the powers can be...

4. Amendment in Para 4.32(i) of Chapter 4 of the Foreign Trade Policy 2015-20

5. Contravention of Sections 8(1) and 9(1)(f)(i) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - receiving foreign exchange payments in 1996-97 through fake export documents...

6. Revised monetary limits for adjudication of show cause notices in Central Excise for commodities classified under Chapter 24 of Schedule IV (tobacco and tobacco...

7. Interim order directing release of goods upon depositing Rs. 4 lakhs challenged. Considering the order, determined liability of Rs. 22,35,932/- on respondent No. 1, and...

8. Service tax recovery from foreign government agencies for statutory fees/licenses - Petitioner's declaration under SVLDRS rejected - HC held pre-deposit amount during...

9. Validity of assessment - Non issuing of notice u/s 143(2) - Applicability of provisions of section 292BB - Before the Tribunal the AR could not submit any proof for...

10. Stay of demand - pre-deposit of only 20% of the disputed demand - adjustments of refunds against demand - respondent is entitled to seek pre-deposit of only 20% of the...

11. Budget 2019-20 + FINANCE (No. 2) BILL, 2019 with Focused Areas i.e Explanatory Notes

12. Amendments/Corrections in Table 2 of Appendix 3B Foreign Trade Policy 2015-20 - Public Notice

13. In the case, ITAT decided on two main issues: 1. Addition on account of Gold and Silver Jewellery u/s 69A: Assessee disclosed Rs. 70,00,000 as unexplained investment...

14. Foreign Exchange Management (Guarantees) (Amendment) Regulations, 2012 – Amendment in Regulations 2 And 4 - Notification

15. Lack of mandatory pre-deposit of 7.5% - during the course of investigation Rs. 7,81,861/- was actually paid by the appellants which has been appropriated towards total...