Validity of order passed by PCIT u/s 264 - Non-consideration of ...

Court Questions PCIT Order u/s 264 for Ignoring Assessee's Submissions; Time-Barred Argument Rejected by Respondents.

July 15, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Validity of order passed by PCIT u/s 264 - Non-consideration of submissions of the assessee - Contention of the respondents that it was time barring matter is not acceptable in view of the fact that the relevant assessment order to be revised was received by the petitioner on 4th February, 2020 and as per the statute, limitation is two years from the date of receipt of such assessment order, so, the time for passing the impugned order was becoming barred on 3rd February, 2022 and in view of this fact, the respondent Commissioner could have easily considered the aforesaid objection of the petitioner on 29th March, 2021. There was enough time available to the Commissioner but hastily he passed the impugned order on 29th March, 2021. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of order passed by PCIT u/s 264 - Non-consideration of ...

Court Questions PCIT Order u/s 264 for Ignoring Assessee's Submissions; Time-Barred Argument Rejected by Respondents.

July 15, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Jurisdiction of civil court u/s 34 of SARFAESI Act was in question. Suit for declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction was rejected by lower courts under Order...

Section 7 application rejected as barred by Section 10A of IBC. Supreme Court held no bar in amending pleadings or filing additional documents u/s 7, but present case...

The Supreme Court addressed a case involving dishonour of cheque and time limitation. The party sought to quash proceedings, arguing the debt was time-barred u/s the...

Rectification u/s 154 application rejected as being time barred - The Appellate Tribunal agreed with the assessee's contention that the rectification application was not...

Maintainability of appeal - appeal dismissed on the ground of time limitation - non-submission of the certified copy. - Despite discrepancies raised by the respondent...

Rebate claim – refund claim was time barred - rebate claim was rightly rejected as time barred but the re-credit of duty paid in Cenvat account is not admissible - CGOVT

Time limit to pass assessment u/s. 92CA(3) - Transfer pricing adjustments - After thorough consideration of the statutory provisions and legal arguments presented by...

In this case, the High Court addressed the issue of a rejected refund claim due to being time-barred. The key determination was the relevant date for calculating the...

The Kerala High Court addressed a case involving the denial of Input Tax Credit (ITC) and a challenge to an assessment order on the grounds of being time-barred. The...

The assessment order passed u/s 144C(3) was beyond the prescribed period of one month from the end of the month in which the period for filing objections u/s 144C(2)...

The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the assessing officer against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, holding that no substantial question of law...

Conduct of Assessment Proceedings electronically in time-barring scrutiny cases - Order u/s 119

The High Court dismissed the writ petition. The petitioner, being a registered person not liable for registration before the appointed day of 01.07.2017, sought...

Validity of Assessment order as time barred - delay dispatching assessment order - The Tribunal, after considering the submissions and relevant precedents, concluded...

HC held reassessment proceedings initiated u/s 148 were invalid due to statutory limitation u/s 149. The original notice was set aside for lacking mandatory approvals...

Quick Updates: