Penalty for Non Quoting of PAN - the assessee does not deserve ...

Penalty of Rs.10,000 Imposed for Each Year Due to Failure to Quote PAN, No Leniency Granted in Case.

October 25, 2012

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty for Non Quoting of PAN - the assessee does not deserve any lenient view - Assessee is liable for penalty of Rs.10,000/- in each assessment year in dispute - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty for Non Quoting of PAN - the assessee does not deserve ...

Penalty of Rs.10,000 Imposed for Each Year Due to Failure to Quote PAN, No Leniency Granted in Case.

October 25, 2012

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Appellant failed to submit required documents within stipulated time for provisional duty assessment, contravening Customs (Provisional Duty Assessment) Regulations,...

The assessment years beyond six years but not exceeding ten years can be reopened u/s 153A only if the Assessing Officer possesses evidence depicting escapement of...

CESTAT upheld reclassification of imported high conductivity copper bus bars from CTI 7407 21 20 to CTI 7407 10 30, resulting in denial of FTA benefits under N/N....

The ITAT held that the assessment years 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12 were beyond the 10-year limitation period u/s 153C read with Explanation-1 to section 153A. Hence,...

The case involves imposition of penalty on a Customs House Agent (CHA) u/s 114 (iii) of the Customs Act 1962 for misusing drawback benefit through fraudulent exports....

The case pertains to the imposition of a fine and penalty for the rejection of the declared value and redetermination of the value u/r 12 of the Customs Valuation...

Levy of penalty- Fraudulent issuance of GDRs by the Company - the imposition of penalty upon the appellant after 12 years from date of resigning is excessive. In a large...

HC granted bail to the applicant in a money laundering case after 3 years and 10 months of incarceration, applying Section 436A of CrPC which prevails over Section 45 of...

Customs broker's license suspension case involving violations of Regulations 10(d) and 10(e) of Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations (CBLR), 2018. Gross mis-declaration...

Jurisdiction of Superintendent to pass the order - Monetary limit - The High Court noted that, the circular dated 9.2.2018 limited the power of the Superintendent,...

Section 12(1)(b) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 requires reporting entities to furnish information about transactions referred to in Section 12(1)(a) to...

SC modified honorarium structure for High-Powered Sale Committee (HPSC) members due to infrequent meetings creating compensation disparity. Initially, Member Secretary...

HC addressed valuation dispute regarding exported Printed Circuit Boards where penalty was significantly increased from Rs.1,00,000 to Rs.1,00,00,000 in subsequent...

The CESTAT held that the imported betel nuts were rightly classified under CTH 0802 8030. While the minimum import price fixed by DGFT could not be treated as tariff...

Levy of personal penalty of Rs. 10 lacs u/r 26 of CER, on appellant being DGM-Finance of the company - The appellant being worked as DGM Finance ultimately all the...

Quick Updates: