Penalty u/s 271-B - failure to get accounts audited - Under ...

Case Laws Income Tax

October 29, 2012

Penalty u/s 271-B - failure to get accounts audited - Under Section 271B there is discretion with the income tax authorities to award penalty and this discretion has to be exercised fairly and reasonably - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271-B - failure to get accounts audited - Under ...

Case Laws Income Tax

October 29, 2012

You may also like:

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

Penalty U/s 271B - Failure to get accounts audited - Penalty confirmed - AT

Penalty 271(1)(c) - additions on account of donation and charity, and on account of loss on sale of assets, which were debited to the profit and loss account - The ITAT...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty order did not specify the particular limb under which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is levied. AO has not specified that penalty is either levied...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - failure on the part of legal heir of the deceased assessee to explain the source of part of the deposits - The mere failure on the part of the...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) concerning the correct classification of income. The Assessing Officer treated the income as 'income...

The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be imposed for an ad-hoc disallowance of 20% of expenses made by the Assessing Officer....

Levy of Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The ITAT ruled that since there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, there was no concealment of income by the...

Section 271(1)(c) penalty was held invalid due to improper issuance of notice, as no proceedings were pending when the notice was issued on 19.12.2019. Section 271A...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Failure of the assessee to explain the source of cash deposit in the bank account - burden of proof - The ITAT acknowledged the...

Control of income-tax authorities - U/s 118 of IT ACT 1961 - Specifies the income-tax authority or authorities as subordinate to such other income-tax authority or...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee filed return of income in response to notice u/s 148 - No difference between returned income and assessed income - Assessee voluntarily...

No doubt the discretion to levy the penalty or to drop the penalty proceedings is entirely the discretion of the appropriate authority who is authorized under the...

Quick Updates: