Maintainability of appeal - low tax effect - Penalty - Since the ...

Appeal on Low Tax Effect Dismissed; Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Not Covered by CBDT Circular No. 3/2018 Exception.

September 8, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Maintainability of appeal - low tax effect - Penalty - Since the levy of penalty by no means could be construed as an addition within the meaning of Para 10(e) of the aforesaid circular, therefore, we do not find any merit in the claim raised by the revenue that the aforementioned exception carved out in the CBDT Circular No. 3/2018 (supra) would also take within its sweep penalty imposed by the A.O. under Sec. 271(1)(c) of the Act in respect of an addition of bogus purchases on the basis of an information received from Sales Tax Authorities i.e. an external agency. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Maintainability of appeal - low tax effect - Penalty - Since the ...

Appeal on Low Tax Effect Dismissed; Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Not Covered by CBDT Circular No. 3/2018 Exception.

September 8, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

ITAT dismissed assessee's appeal citing low tax effect as per CBDT Circular No.3/2018, giving Revenue liberty to recall dismissal if covered by exceptions. Assessee...

Maintainability of appeal - low tax effect - the case was reopened on the basis of revenue audit objection and in such circumstances, the same would be covered under the...

Rectification of mistake u/s 154 - AO issued notice u/s 154 based on audit objections, adding waiver of principal amount and revising book profit. Tribunal dismissed...

Monetary limit for filing of appeal by revenue in case of penalty - Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on bogus purchases - Quantum proceedings and penalty proceedings are...

Maintainability of revenue appeals before the Tribunal when the tax effect is below a certain threshold. According to CBDT instructions, subordinate authorities should...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of 20% on account of bogus purchases - Monetary limit for filing appeal - The revenue has tried to make out a case that since the...

Penalty levied under 271(1)(c) - The revenue has tried to make out a case that since the addition was made pursuant to information from sales tax department, this...

The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - combined order of penalty for additions made vide order u/s 143(3) r.w.s. u/s 153A and u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 - AO required to initiate two...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal deleted the penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) for non-compliance with a notice issued u/s 142(1) during reassessment proceedings....

The assessee had conceded the compensation income to be included as income from other sources. However, upon judicial examination, the compensation was found to be...

Maintainability of appeal - ITAT dismissed the appeal on the ground of low tax effect being less than 10 lakhs - Board Circular No.21/2015 - Determination of tax effect...

Penalty u/s.271(1)(c) or penalty u/s.271AAA - The provisions of Section 271AAA(3) of the Act specifically excludes the provisions of Section 271(1)(c) of the Act for the...

Circular No. 05/2024, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) under section 268A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, introduces measures to reduce litigation in...

Quick Updates: