Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Indian Laws - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2021 Year 2021 This

Power of Court to entertain an application u/s 9(1) of the ...


Court's Power Limited Under Arbitration Act Section 9(1) Once Tribunal Formed; Section 9(3) Allows Interim Measures if Needed.

September 16, 2021

Case Laws     Indian Laws     SC

Power of Court to entertain an application u/s 9(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - On a combined reading of Section 9 with Section 17 of the Arbitration Act, once an Arbitral Tribunal is constituted, the Court would not entertain and/or in other words take up for consideration and apply its mind to an application for interim measure, unless the remedy under Section 17 is inefficacious, even though the application may have been filed before the constitution of the Arbitral Tribunal. The bar of Section 9(3) would not operate, once an application has been entertained and taken up for consideration - It could never have been the legislative intent that even after an application under Section 9 is finally heard relief would have to be declined and the parties be remitted to their remedy under Section 17. - SC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The High Court exceeded its limited jurisdiction u/s 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by undertaking a detailed examination of the factual matrix and...

  2. The High Court declined to grant interim relief, emphasizing that the amended writ petition raised numerous complex grounds which cannot be adjudicated fully at the...

  3. Notification 52/2003-Cus dated 31.03.2003 governs the re-import of goods after export. Sr. No. 14 allows re-import for repair/reconditioning within 3/7 years,...

  4. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) examined the issue of merger of intimation u/s 143(1) and scrutiny assessment u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act. The case...

  5. The High Court dismissed the writ petition. The petitioner, being a registered person not liable for registration before the appointed day of 01.07.2017, sought...

  6. Statutory provisions regarding restoration of a company's name on the Register of Companies maintained by the Registrar of Companies (ROC) u/s 252(1) and 252(3) of the...

  7. The High Court allowed the petitioner to rectify GSTR-1 for the months of October and November 2022 regarding five export invoices, despite the statutory time limit...

  8. This case deals with the applicability of Section 153, the limitation provision, to proceedings u/s 144C of the Income Tax Act. The key issues are whether the 11-month...

  9. The appellant was found guilty of bid rigging and cartelization in a tender process initiated by SBIIMS, contravening Sections 3(3)(c), 3(3)(d), and 3(1) of the...

  10. Income Tax: Limit of remuneration to working partners in partnership firms allowed as deduction increased - on first Rs 6,00,000 of book profit or loss, Rs 3,00,000 or...

  11. Situation arising out of lockdown ordered as a precaution for prevention of Coronavirus spread - extension of dates of courts to approach the courts of law - All interim...

  12. In the context of an appeal u/s 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration Act, the Court held that while the Appellate Court has the power to remand the matter to the Section 34...

  13. The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner seeking permission to rectify/amend the GST number of the purchaser in GSTR-1 return after the...

  14. The Appellate Tribunal examined the reopening of assessment u/s 147 beyond the limitation period, involving the addition of cash deposits in the assessee's savings bank...

  15. Power u/s 83 as well as under Section 5(3) off KGST Act - designation of proper officer in terms of Sections 83(1) and 5(3) of the Act be adjudicated upon - Power to...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates