Non-genuine creditors u/s 41(1) - proof of liability ceased to ...

Assessee Cleared: Section 41(1) Scrutiny Finds Transaction Valid Despite Missing Confirmation Letter From Creditor.

September 21, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Non-genuine creditors u/s 41(1) - proof of liability ceased to exist - Simply because, the assessee could not produce the confirmation from this party, the genuineness of transaction cannot be doubted. All the relevant details proving the transaction as genuine were available on record despite that, the A.O’s mere emphasis was on the production of the confirmation from this party. In fact, the name and addresses were mentioned in the copies of bills of sale and purchase. - No Additions - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Non-genuine creditors u/s 41(1) - proof of liability ceased to ...

Assessee Cleared: Section 41(1) Scrutiny Finds Transaction Valid Despite Missing Confirmation Letter From Creditor.

September 21, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Section 80P deduction claim filed in a return submitted in response to notice u/s 142(1) is valid. The Income Tax Act does not mandate that the return must be filed u/ss...

The Appellate Tribunal examined the reopening of assessment u/s 147 beyond the limitation period, involving the addition of cash deposits in the assessee's savings bank...

Scope of the Adjustment made by the CPC u/s 143(1) when scrutiny assessment made u/s 143(3) - Considering the facts that the case of the assessee was subsequently taken...

The case pertains to the treatment of income received from an arbitral award in the assessment year. The AO passed an assessment order u/s 143(3) after the case was...

Scope of limited scrutiny - cash deposits in the Bank accounts being more than the turnover - The impugned addition made by the AO on account of profit allegedly earned...

The ITAT upheld the validity of adjustments made in the intimation u/s 143(1) regarding the addition of payment of employees' contribution to PF and ESIC beyond the due...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the imposition of penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1). The assessee eventually responded to the notice...

Undervalued/preferential/fraudulent transactions - Failure to adjudicate about the ingredients of Section 43, 45, 49 and 66, specifically - need for separate...

Assessment framed without issuing mandatory notice u/s 143(2) by jurisdictional officer. Assessee filed return with Range-1(1), notice u/s 143(2) issued by ITO,...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed despite the assessee withdrawing the exemption claim u/s 10(38) for Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) on sale of penny stocks and offering...

Applicability of Section 64(1) and Section 54F of the Income Tax Act. Section 64(1) allows for the inclusion of a dependent spouse's income in the assessee's taxable...

Non-filer assessee had taxable income but failed to file return u/s 139(1), later filed return in response to notice u/s 148 without considering section 50C provisions,...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

The case pertains to rectification u/s 154 and the power of the Assessing Officer (AO) to travel beyond the reasons for which the case was selected for scrutiny. The key...

Quick Updates: