Revision u/s 263 by CIT - AO's omission to frame draft ...

September 25, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - AO's omission to frame draft assessment order u/s 144C - An action made without jurisdiction and ergo the assessment order dated 25.09.2017 is null in the eyes of law and therefore, is non est. Therefore, when the foundation itself does not exist, i.e., assessment order dated 25.09.2017 is non-est, the Ld. PCIT could not have exercised his jurisdiction to interfere with void/null order which is not existing in the eyes of law and, therefore, the impugned order of Ld. PCIT is also a nullity. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - AO's omission to frame draft ...

September 25, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Assessment u/s 153A - validity of granting the approval u/s 153D - The action of the JCIT granting approval in this case was a mere mechanical exercise, accepting the...

Condonation of delay of 163 days, 207 days & 197 days in filing appeal by Revenue - A perusal of paragraphs 3 to 8 of the application of condonation of delay would...

Proceedings initiated u/s 144C - legality of the order by framing the so-called draft assessment order - while framing the said draft assessment order, the AO not only...

Validity of assessment framed by the AO u/s 153C without issuing notice u/s 143(2) - when no notice under section 143(2) is required for framing the assessment under...

Non following Procedure laid down u/s 144C - Action of the AO/NeAC not proposing all the variation in the Draft Assessment Order - The Tribunal agrees with the...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Unexplained bank deposits - PCIT, without making further inquiry on his own account, has simply stated in the impugned order that the Assessing...

Validity of assessment u/s 153A - Non issuance of notice U/s 143(2) - Protective assessment - the assessment has been made on a protective basis, but, it is not clear...

Revision u/s 263 - Addition u/s 68 - second revisional jurisdiction of Pr. CIT - Whether the AO (called second AO) has not conducted enquiry while framing re-assessment...

The Appellate Tribunal held that the issues on which the reassessment order was passed u/s 147 read with Section 143(3) and the issues on which the revision order was...

AO suo-moto framed the order u/s. 154 and rectified the order - AO framed order u/s. 154 of the Act without affording a reasonable and adequate opportunity of being...

Default in payment of Central Excise Duty - By making the demand as above nearly one year later, for the clearances made without payment of duty revenue was not only...

Comments/suggestions invited on ‘Draft Adjudication Manual’ - Cir. No. Draft Circular Dated: November 29, 2011

Draft assessment order u/s 144C in the name of a non-existent company - amalgamation of the company under the scheme of merger - the draft order framed u/s 144C(1) of...

Draft Circulars for comments on Draft ‘Bill of Entry (Electronic Declaration) Regulations, 2011’ and Draft ‘Shipping Bill (Electronic Declaration) Regulations, 2011’

Revision u/s 263 - period of limitation - To be calculated from the date of original assessment or from the date of re-assessment after reopening - the issue on which...

Quick Updates: