Refund of duty paid in excess - captive consumption - applicable ...

Appellants Denied Cement Duty Refund; Rule 8 of Valuation Rules Deemed Inapplicable by Authorities.

November 10, 2021

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Refund of duty paid in excess - captive consumption - applicable valuation rules - manufacture of cement and cement clinker - The appellants were also using the manufactured cement for their own consumption - the applicability of Rule 8 of Valuation Rules has rightly been denied by the Adjudicating Authorities below. The appellant is therefore, not entitled for refund, claiming the said applicability. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund of duty paid in excess - captive consumption - applicable ...

Appellants Denied Cement Duty Refund; Rule 8 of Valuation Rules Deemed Inapplicable by Authorities.

November 10, 2021

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

The key legal issues and holdings in this case are: 1. Valuation of clinkers transferred by the appellant to their sister concern should be done u/r 4 read with Rule 11...

Method of valuation - Rule 11 is adopted when the situation is not covered by any of the other methods of valuation prescribed from Rule 4 to 10A. The method of...

Valuation - clearance of HTS wire to their sister concern for pressed concrete slippers by the said sister concern - The adjudicating authority below has failed to...

Anti-Profiteering - Duties of the Authority - Rule 127 of the CGST Rules, 2017 as amended.

The appellant was denied CENVAT credit on the allegation that the sender units inflated the value of Soap Noodles stock transferred to the appellant, leading to excess...

Liability to pay interest on the goods cleared to their sister unit in terms of proviso to Rule 9 read with Rule 8 of the Valuation Rules, 2000 - The appellant...

Method of Valuation - prototype vehicles - goods cleared from the factory on payment of duty under self invoice on the comparable value of the similar vehicle applying...

Revision u/s 263 - error noted by the CIT that sale of properties by the assessee during the year was not examined by the AO vis-à-vis its stamp duty value for the...

Valuation - adjustment of excess excise duty paid against the short payment - during the relevant period the Appellant had paid the correct duty arrived at in terms of...

Since Appellant were paying the duty utilizing the CENVAT Credit they cannot be charged for contravention of the provisions of Rule 4, 8(1), 8(3) & 8(3A) of the Central...

The applicant had suppressed material facts from the Authority for Advance Ruling by mis-declaring that the issue was not pending in any other proceedings, when in fact,...

Dispute regarding valuation of imported goods under Customs Valuation Rules. Related parties involved, 10% loading applied to transaction value earlier. New Customs...

Clandestine removal of excisable goods - Penalty u/r 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 imposed on Managing Director. Appellant challenged Order upholding penalty without...

Method of valuation - Revenue neutrality - Extended period of limitation - goods transferred to another unit for captive consumption - to be valued in accordance with...

The case involved a dispute over the valuation of power units supplied by one party to another, leading to a demand for differential duty, interest, and penalty. The...

Quick Updates: