Revision u/s 263 by CIT- AO is first an investigating officer ...

Income Tax Commissioner Revises AO's Order Due to Lack of Investigation in Portfolio Loss Case u/s 263.

November 15, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Revision u/s 263 by CIT- AO is first an investigating officer thereafter he is an adjudicator but here in this case, the AO remained silent, but, he ought to have exercised his duty properly. We find substance in the submissions made by the ld. DR. The arguments of the AR is rejected in regard to show cause notice and finding of the Pr. CIT is different because the issues are the loss on assigned portfolio. and the Pr. CIT has rightly exercised his jurisdiction vested u/s 263 and set aside the order of AO - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 by CIT- AO is first an investigating officer ...

Income Tax Commissioner Revises AO's Order Due to Lack of Investigation in Portfolio Loss Case u/s 263.

November 15, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 - merely because the ld. PCIT does not agree with the order of the AO cannot make the order erroneous as long as the same was passed after all possible...

The Appellate Tribunal examined the issue of invoking revisional jurisdiction u/s 263 in a case involving receipts of accommodation entries and reopening of assessment....

The ITAT addressed a case involving revision u/s 263 where the main allegation was the non-disclosure of agricultural income affecting the deduction u/s 54B. The...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Rejection of trading results - lack of enquiry" or "lack of investigation" - Rejection of trading results and application of net profit rate by...

Invocation of Section 263 by the Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax (PCIT), alleging non-application of mind and lack of jurisdiction. The key points are: The...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT-A - AO’s order is not erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue since mark to market loss incurred by Company on revaluation of...

The High Court held that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) lacked jurisdiction to pass an order u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act in this case. The Assessing...

Revision u/s 263 - Lack of enquiry is a reason for taking up the case for revision u/s 263 of the Act but the inadequate enquiry cannot be a reason for taking up the...

Revision u/s 263 - business loss cannot be set off against other sources as per sec.71 - there is a divergent view on the issue of set off of business loss out of...

Revision u/s 263 - There is no quarrel on the point that if the AO has raised the query on this issue of applicability of provision of section 115BBE which was replied...

The Appellate Tribunal reviewed a case involving a revision u/s 263 related to deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i). The AO allowed interest income from FD investments as a...

The ITAT Jaipur addressed a case involving a revision u/s 263 concerning the addition u/s 68 based on a report from an investigation in Mumbai. The PCIT contended that...

Section 263 revision - Unexplained income u/s 69A read with Section 115BBE - Cash seized shown as 'income from other sources' - Whether to be treated as unexplained...

Penalty levied u/s 274 read with Section 270A - assessee computed tax on disallowed depreciation amount at maximum marginal rate and levied 200% penalty on payable tax -...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - setting off of derivative loss against business income - the Tribunal has not given a specific finding as to how there is no bar under the...

Quick Updates: