Refund of excess amount deposited - The petitioner is right in ...

Court Limits Appeal Deposit to 7.5% of Disputed Amount; Orders Refund of Excess to Petitioner.

January 20, 2022

Case Laws Customs HC

Refund of excess amount deposited - The petitioner is right in his contention that the maximum liability to deposit the disputed amount in the appeal already preferred by the petitioner, which is pending adjudication is 7.5% of the disputed amount; it follows therefrom that in view of my finding that the impugned letters / orders are illegal and arbitrary and deserve to be quashed, by also applying the principles of restitution, it is necessary to direct the respondents to refund / repay any sum in excess of 7.5% back to the petitioner pending disposal of the appeal and by issuing necessary directions in this regard - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund of excess amount deposited - The petitioner is right in ...

Court Limits Appeal Deposit to 7.5% of Disputed Amount; Orders Refund of Excess to Petitioner.

January 20, 2022

Case Laws Customs HC

You may also like:

HC ruled on tax settlement scheme interpretation regarding admitted versus disputed tax amounts. Settlement Officer erroneously deducted pre-deposit from disputed amount...

Re-Determination of refund and interest thereon - Subsequent to the direction of the High Court, revised assessment order was passed, refund and interest amount was...

Determination of service tax liability on the approval of resolution plant under IBC - The amount of service tax dues having thus crystallized, the resolution plan says...

Claim of Interest on Refund u/s 7 of the DTVSV Act, 2020 - The High court determined that the petitioner was entitled to refunds as quantified in the Rectification Order...

Refund of GST paid deposited by the Vendor on advance paid by the appellant since no supply was made - Return/refund of the entire advance amount - The High Court found...

Contempt application preferred by the appellant alleging non-compliance of order passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court - entitlement to refund of the...

Grant of Moratorium due to COVID-19 pandemic situation - Restraint on respondent from recovering loan repayment instalments/EMI due - RBI Circular dated 27.03.2020 -...

Conviction u/ss 420, 467, 468, 120B of the IPC and Section 5(2) and 5(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Petitioner worked as Appraiser in Customs office....

The High Court allowed the petition and quashed the impugned order rejecting the petitioner's refund application for unutilized input tax credit. The court held that the...

This Court directed the respondents to process the petitioner's refund claims and grant a refund of the excess tax amount collected from the petitioner and deposited by...

HC determined petitioner entitled to refund of Rs.33,69,271 paid under CGST Act following Section 128A implementation. Department confirmed adjustment of amount through...

The High Court held that u/s 54 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, when the input tax credit paid is higher than the output tax, the dealer is entitled to seek a...

Adjustment of amount of the duty demanded against the EOU unit - goods manufactured in EOU sold in DTA unit - The stand of respondent no.2 cannot be accepted that even...

HC allowed the writ petition, setting aside the respondent's order rejecting the petitioner's application to rectify Form-3 under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act,...

Refund of the amount as deposited by the assesse towards part payment of demand raised - Time limit for completion of assessment, reassessment and recomputation - The...

Quick Updates: