The High Court set aside the impugned tax demand order due to ...

Tax demand order overturned for lack of due process, petitioner gets chance to reply.

Case Laws GST

October 16, 2024

The High Court set aside the impugned tax demand order due to violation of principles of natural justice, as the petitioner was not provided a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. The petitioner was unaware of the proceedings culminating in the order, which related to a mismatch between the petitioner's GSTR 3B returns and the auto-populated GSTR 2A. The court permitted the petitioner to submit a reply to the show cause notice after remitting 10% of the disputed tax demand, in the interest of justice, to contest the tax demand on merits. The petition was disposed of on this condition.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The High Court set aside the impugned tax demand order due to ...

Tax demand order overturned for lack of due process, petitioner gets chance to reply.

Case Laws GST

October 16, 2024

You may also like:

The High Court found a violation of natural justice as the petitioner was not given a fair chance to contest a tax demand due to a mismatch between GSTR 3B return and...

Principles of natural justice violated due to lack of jurisdiction and non-application of mind. Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) liability issue: Petitioner's reply on...

Interest u/s 234C - interest for deferment of advance tax - If on a particular due date for payment of advance tax, the facts show that there is no liability to pay...

Petitioner challenged ineligibility for Input Tax Credit (ITC) on certain commodities as per Section 17(5) of GST statutes and ITC on supplies from cancelled dealers....

CBDT extends due date for filing Income Tax Returns and Tax Audit Reports

The High Court found a violation of natural justice principles due to lack of reasoning in orders of Assistant Commissioner and GST officer. The orders did not address...

Principles of natural justice violated due to lack of reasonable opportunity to contest tax demand. Petitioner cited ongoing tax audit and father's illness for seeking...

Non-issuance of ASMT-10 notice vitiated scrutiny conclusions but not adjudication as petitioner was provided opportunity to show cause - Tax proposal confirmed due to...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - adjustment made u/s 92CA - penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) on the adjustment made u/s 92CA is not...

The assessee failed to deduct tax on professional fees paid to various non-residents. The Assessing Officer (AO) held that the fees were liable to tax in India under the...

Violation of principles of natural justice - It was contended that impugned order does not take into consideration the reply submitted by the Petitioner and is a cryptic...

The High Court addressed a case involving penalty for non-filing of annual return under the GST laws. The petitioner argued that notices were only uploaded on the GST...

The provisions of the IBC 2016 would prevail over the Income Tax Act 1961. Income Tax authorities have limited jurisdiction to assess/determine the quantum of Income Tax...

Sale of mortgaged property for recovery of excise dues - Excise dues are not dues which arise out of land or building. Such liabilities could be in the form of property...

The High Court set aside an assessment order due to lack of reasonable opportunity for the petitioner to contest the tax demand on merits. The show cause notice and...

Quick Updates: