Demand of GST - Discrepancy between the GSTR-3B returns and the ...

GST Demand Discrepancy Over ITC: Court Quashes Assessment Order, Allows Contest; Petitioner to Pay 10% of Disputed Tax.

March 13, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

Demand of GST - Discrepancy between the GSTR-3B returns and the auto populated GSTR-2A returns - The court observed that the tax demand solely pertained to the disparity between the Input Tax Credit (ITC) claimed in the GSTR-3B return and that reflected in the auto-populated GSTR-2A returns. It noted that the transaction's genuineness was not in question. - Acknowledging the contention regarding non-adherence to applicable circulars, the court deemed it appropriate to provide the petitioner an opportunity to contest the tax demand. - The court quashed the impugned assessment order with the condition that the petitioner remits 10% of the disputed tax demand within two weeks.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Demand of GST - Discrepancy between the GSTR-3B returns and the ...

GST Demand Discrepancy Over ITC: Court Quashes Assessment Order, Allows Contest; Petitioner to Pay 10% of Disputed Tax.

March 13, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

The High Court addressed a challenge to assessment orders where the petitioner lacked a reasonable opportunity to contest tax demands due to discrepancies in returns....

The Madras High Court found a violation of natural justice as notices were only uploaded on the GST portal without direct communication to the petitioner. The tax...

The court held that the reversal of Input Tax Credit (ITC) by the department due to discrepancy between GSTR 3B and auto-populated GSTR 2A violated principles of natural...

GST : 10 POINT SERIES ON SUPPLY - Goods and Services Tax - GST

The High Court considered the validity of an assessment order cancelling the petitioner's GST registration. The petitioner lacked access to the GST portal and was...

Validity of demand of GST - For assessment year 2017-2018 - Notice in Form ASMT-10 issued for discrepancies found in returns - proceedings initiated pursuant to notice...

The High Court held that petitioners are entitled to pay 10% of the disputed GST amount as a pre-condition for filing an appeal by debiting the amount available in the...

The petitioner challenged the order and summary order alleging discrepancies between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, and excess availment of Input Tax Credit (ITC). The petitioner...

The High Court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter back to the respondent authority to pass a fresh order. This was subject to the condition that the...

The High Court set aside the impugned tax demand order due to violation of principles of natural justice, as the petitioner was not provided a reasonable opportunity to...

Validity of assessment order - Discrepancy Nos. 1, 2, 10, and 11: The discrepancies include issues such as non-GST supplies, alleged mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-1...

Eligibility for Input Tax Credit - Failure to report outward supply - The objection of the petitioner is that most of these items do not fall within the reverse charge...

Validity of order in original and Demand of GST - These issues included discrepancies in GST returns, imposition of cess, treatment of scrips, and taxation of corporate...

Levy of penalty u/s 129(5) of GST Act for discrepancy between PIN code of petitioner in Tax Invoices and E-Way Bill. Court held minor discrepancy in PIN code in GST...

Non-issuance of ASMT-10 notice vitiated scrutiny conclusions but not adjudication as petitioner was provided opportunity to show cause - Tax proposal confirmed due to...

Quick Updates: