Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
GST - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2024 Year 2024 This

Demand of GST - Discrepancy between the GSTR-3B returns and the ...

March 13, 2024

Case Laws     GST     HC

Demand of GST - Discrepancy between the GSTR-3B returns and the auto populated GSTR-2A returns - The court observed that the tax demand solely pertained to the disparity between the Input Tax Credit (ITC) claimed in the GSTR-3B return and that reflected in the auto-populated GSTR-2A returns. It noted that the transaction's genuineness was not in question. - Acknowledging the contention regarding non-adherence to applicable circulars, the court deemed it appropriate to provide the petitioner an opportunity to contest the tax demand. - The court quashed the impugned assessment order with the condition that the petitioner remits 10% of the disputed tax demand within two weeks.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The High Court found a violation of principles of natural justice as the notices were uploaded on the "view additional notices and orders" tab of the GST portal, and the...

  2. The court held that the reversal of Input Tax Credit (ITC) by the department due to discrepancy between GSTR 3B and auto-populated GSTR 2A violated principles of natural...

  3. The High Court set aside the impugned tax demand order due to violation of principles of natural justice, as the petitioner was not provided a reasonable opportunity to...

  4. Validity of assessment order - mismatch between the GSTR 3B returns filed by the petitioner and the auto-populated GSTR 2A returns - The High court acknowledged the...

  5. The High Court granted relief to the petitioner by directing the release of attachment over immovable properties due to discrepancies between GSTR 3B returns and...

  6. In a High Court case, the petitioner challenged an order due to inability to respond to show cause notice or participate in proceedings because of cancer diagnosis....

  7. Validity of assessment order - Disparity in Returns - The High Court examined the case thoroughly. It noted that the entire tax liability stemmed from the disparity...

  8. The court set aside the impugned order pertaining to tax demand arising from mismatch between GSTR 3B returns and auto-populated GSTR 2A, subject to petitioner remitting...

  9. Tax assessment proceedings involving GSTR 3B returns mismatch with auto-populated GSTR 2A. Disputed tax demand partially recovered through bank appropriation exceeding...

  10. Discrepancies between input tax credit availed by petitioner in GSTR 3B and auto-populated GSTR 2A. Court granted partial relief by setting aside impugned order...

  11. Principles of natural justice violated as petitioner was not provided reasonable opportunity to contest tax demand due to unawareness of proceedings entrusted to...

  12. Petitioner failed to substantiate Input Tax Credit claim due to lack of supplier certificates. Discrepancy noted between Input Tax Credit availed in GSTR 3B and...

  13. Reimbursement of GST on production charges/supply of meals with effect from 1st July 2017 - welcome drink served to the passengers was provided by IRCTC - IRCTC’s...

  14. Violation of principles of natural justice occurred as petitioner's contentions were not considered - mismatch between petitioner's GSTR 3B returns and auto-populated...

  15. Petitioner challenged order u/s 74 of TNGST Act, 2017 for assessment year 2017-18 due to mismatch between GSTR 3B and auto-populated GSTR 2A regarding input tax credit....

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates