Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - deduction of LTCG u/s 54F - The ...

Penalty Not Justified for Disallowed LTCG Deduction Claim u/s 54F; Good Faith Considered in Section 271(1)(c) Case.

March 3, 2022

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - deduction of LTCG u/s 54F - The assessee acted in bona fide belief and made the claim is not acceptable due to any reason and was disallowed the same cannot be subject to levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) . - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - deduction of LTCG u/s 54F - The ...

Penalty Not Justified for Disallowed LTCG Deduction Claim u/s 54F; Good Faith Considered in Section 271(1)(c) Case.

March 3, 2022

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - deduction u/s. 80GGC denied - second round of appeal - the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the claim for deduction was...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) for disallowing deductions u/ss 54EC and 54F. Assessee admitted and withdrew incorrect claim u/s 54EC, constituting furnishing of...

Disallowance u/s 80P - claim disallowed u/sec. 143(1)(a)(ii) by way of “processing” as an instance of “incorrect claim if such incorrect claim is there from any...

Penalty u/s 271(l)(c) - The assessee has immediately on receipt of the notice u/s 142(1) has revised the computation of income restricting the deduction claimed u/s 54F...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - adjustment made u/s 92CA - penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) on the adjustment made u/s 92CA is not...

Disallowance u/s 54F - Investment of Sale consideration for claiming exemption on LTCG - Advance was given for purchase of new residential property but the transaction...

The preliminary assessment u/s 143(1) is limited to processing the return for arithmetical errors, incorrect expense claims, verifying audit reports, deductions, and...

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

Deduction claimed u/s 54F - assessee failed to claim the deduction as cost on improvement rather it was claimed as deduction u/s 54F of the Act at the time of filing of...

Deduction claimed u/s 54F OR 54 - Investment of LTCG - Owning more than one house property - CIT(A) deleted the addition considering the same u/s 54 - Assessee revised...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Transfer Pricing adjustment made - applying the analysis of the term ‘good faith’ and ‘due diligence’ we are of the considered view that in the...

Deduction u/s 54F - LTCG - Out of these 24 flats, 15 flats are already sold in the present year and remaining 9 flats are likely to be sold within the period of three...

The ITAT Chennai ruled on LTCG deduction u/s 54, stating that investment in more than one property is not allowed. Assessee invested in two distinct properties in...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - weighted deduction u/s 35(1)(ii) claimed in the original return and later in the return filed in response to notice u/s 148 of the Act,...

Quick Updates: