TDS u/s 194C - Addition u/s 201/201(1A) - TDS not deducted from ...

Assessee Challenges TDS Deduction u/s 194C; CIT(A) Finds No Tax Liability for Contractors Over Rs. 5,00,000.

April 12, 2022

Case Laws Income Tax AT

TDS u/s 194C - Addition u/s 201/201(1A) - TDS not deducted from the payments made to contractors under various schemes - The proviso clearly states that nothing contained in subsection (5A)and (5B) shall be applied to a person whose total income is not chargeable to income tax and who does not obtain PAN under any provision of the Act. - the assessee has segregated the contractual payments more than ₹ 5,00,000/- and less than ₹ 5,00,000/- and submitted a statement - CIT(A), in his findings also has observed that where the receipts are more than ₹ 5,00,000/-, the contractors have submitted their returns disclosing the receipts and paid the taxes on the same and hence, it cannot be taxed in the hands of the assessee. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

TDS u/s 194C - Addition u/s 201/201(1A) - TDS not deducted from ...

Assessee Challenges TDS Deduction u/s 194C; CIT(A) Finds No Tax Liability for Contractors Over Rs. 5,00,000.

April 12, 2022

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Demand Interest u/s 201(1A) - Non deduction TDS u/s 194IA - As per the sale deed the details of the sellers / transferors of the said property and in fact the sellers...

Tax deducted at source (TDS) credit was denied in the intimation u/s 143(1) to the assessee. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) upheld the Centralized Processing...

Amendment to rules governing salary, allowances and service conditions of Chairperson and members of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India. Key changes: Chairperson's...

The notification amends the National Financial Reporting Authority (Manner of Appointment and other Terms and Conditions of Service of Chairperson and Members) Rules,...

Applicability of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) provisions to a non-resident bank and its CEO. The bank was charged with contravening sections 64(2), 6(4),...

The CESTAT held that the imported betel nuts were rightly classified under CTH 0802 8030. While the minimum import price fixed by DGFT could not be treated as tariff...

The court held that the tax liability arising from the deletion of additions under the remand order would be less than Rs. 1,00,00,000, rendering the appeal...

Reopening of assessment beyond three years requires sanction from Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, whereas the assessee obtained sanction from Principal...

The CESTAT upheld the duty demand, confiscation of imported goods for non-fulfilment of export obligation u/s 111(o), imposition of redemption fine u/s 125, and...

The case involves imposition of penalty on a Customs House Agent (CHA) u/s 114 (iii) of the Customs Act 1962 for misusing drawback benefit through fraudulent exports....

The assessment years beyond six years but not exceeding ten years can be reopened u/s 153A only if the Assessing Officer possesses evidence depicting escapement of...

The Appellate Tribunal held that for determining the holding period of a property or calculating long-term capital gains, the date of allotment of the property is...

In the case, ITAT decided on two main issues: 1. Addition on account of Gold and Silver Jewellery u/s 69A: Assessee disclosed Rs. 70,00,000 as unexplained investment...

ITAT upheld partial rejection of books under s.145(3) due to unverifiable self-made cash vouchers, though specific quantification was lacking. Given turnover of...

Imported goods classification disputed - whether silver jewellery freely importable or restricted category under ITC (HS) Code 71069210. Court found respondent's...

Quick Updates: