Maintainability of Arbitration application - time limitation - ...

Supreme Court Rules Arbitration Request u/s 11(6) Unmaintainable Due to 32-Year Delay Beyond Limitation Period.

April 23, 2022

Case Laws Indian Laws SC

Maintainability of Arbitration application - time limitation - the appellant, who served the legal notice invoking the arbitration clause and requesting for appointment of an arbitrator after a period of approximately thirty-two years, cannot contend that still his application under Section 11(6) of the 1996 Act be considered as the limitation would start from the date of serving the legal notice and after completion of 30 days from the date of service of the legal notice and invoking arbitration clause. - SC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Maintainability of Arbitration application - time limitation - ...

Supreme Court Rules Arbitration Request u/s 11(6) Unmaintainable Due to 32-Year Delay Beyond Limitation Period.

April 23, 2022

Case Laws Indian Laws SC

You may also like:

Application u/s 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 maintainable only with court's liberty upon withdrawal of previous application. Principles of Order 23...

Appointment of an arbitrator - Declination to appoint an Arbitrator in exercise of its power under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - So far...

Exemption u/s 11 - Scope of newly inserted section 11(6) - Depreciation on assets - Double benefit - Apex Court has as settled the issue - amendment brought in Section...

Jurisdiction of the referral court at pre-referral stage - arbitration agreement - If the dispute/issue with respect to the existence and validity of an arbitration...

Assessment u/s 153C - Unexplained investment being share capital and share premium - no incriminating material seized during search. CIT(A) held that three conditions...

The High Court interpreted the phrase "where it is possible to do so" u/s 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, ruling that it allows flexibility only in exceptional...

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgment and order appointing an arbitrator u/s 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. It held that the...

Condonation of delay - delay of 11½ years - on the basis of findings in the order for subsequent year, appeal was filed for earlier year before CIT(A) - it is noticed...

Refund of TDS claimed after 6 years - The application under Section 119(2)(b) of the Act is being denied by adopting a very hyper technical view that the application for...

The High Court exceeded its limited jurisdiction u/s 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by undertaking a detailed examination of the factual matrix and...

Seeking condonation of delay to file a revised return by an application u/s 119(2)(b) - Unfortunately, the assessee’s application u/s 119(2)(b) has been rejected on the...

Unabsorbed depreciation claimed u/s 32(2) - Claim beyond the period of eight years - the assessee is entitled to avail of the unabsorbed depreciation beyond the period...

Arbitration application allowed u/s 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court's role limited to determining existence of arbitration agreement and not...

Denial of exemption u/s 11(2) was contested due to the trust's failure to file Form No. 10 within the due date specified u/s 139(1) owing to technical issues. The...

ITAT ought to have condoned 53 days' delay in preferring appeal as appellant explained delay occurred due to wrong advice of counsel to reapply for registration u/s 12A,...

Quick Updates: