Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights May 2022 Year 2022 This

Stay of demand - ITO passed the impugned order asking the ...


Petitioner to Deposit 10% of Tax Demand; Commissioner to Expedite Appeal Hearing Process for Fairness.

May 17, 2022

Case Laws     Income Tax     HC

Stay of demand - ITO passed the impugned order asking the petitioner to pay 20% of the demand outstanding - the petitioner is directed to deposit 10% of the outstanding demand - CIT(A) directed to dispose of the appeal as expeditiously as possible, after affording an opportunity to the petitioner. - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. HC found merit in petitioner's challenge regarding violation of natural justice principles and non-application of mind in the impugned orders. Court directed petitioner...

  2. The High Court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter back to the respondent authority to pass a fresh order. This was subject to the condition that the...

  3. The High Court held that petitioners are entitled to pay 10% of the disputed GST amount as a pre-condition for filing an appeal by debiting the amount available in the...

  4. Petitioner challenged adjudication order u/s 73 of CGST/WBGST Act, 2017 regarding discrepancies in returns, short payment of tax, and excess availment of Input Tax...

  5. HC set aside the impugned order regarding time limitation and GSTR-3B/GSTR-2A mismatch dispute. The petitioner's willingness to deposit 25% of disputed tax amount was...

  6. Determination of quantum of pre-deposit for filing of appeal - deposit of 10% of the disputed tax amount - The legislative intent as construed from Section 107(6)(b) of...

  7. Criminal complaint filed u/s 200 of Cr.P.C. for the offence punishable u/s 276C(2) read with Section 278B of the Income Tax Act. Petitioners failed to deposit assessed...

  8. Petitioner pre-deposited Rs. 6,25,000/- as condition for filing appeal u/s 51 of TNVAT Act against Assessment Order dated 21.10.2010. After revised Assessment Order on...

  9. The High Court disposed of the writ petition, modifying the requirement to deposit only 10% of the remaining disputed tax amount for the impugned order to remain stayed....

  10. Denial of benefit of lower 22% tax rate u/s 115BAA due to delay in filing Form 10-IC by petitioner. Petitioner filed return of income in ITR-6 form, exercising option...

  11. The High Court considered a challenge to an order u/s WBGST Act due to a 32-day delay in filing an appeal and non-deposit of pre-deposit. The petitioner provided...

  12. Maintainability of appeal - appeal rejected as being defective for non-payment of the pre-deposit - the appeals filed by the instant petitioners u/s 107 of the CGST/BGST...

  13. Non-issuance of ASMT-10 notice vitiated scrutiny conclusions but not adjudication as petitioner was provided opportunity to show cause - Tax proposal confirmed due to...

  14. A Non-Resident Indian residing in Saudi Arabia made fixed deposits from remittances received in Dubai and maturity proceeds of existing term deposits, interest on NRE...

  15. The HC set aside the impugned order due to violation of natural justice principles, specifically non-service of notices and orders that prevented the petitioner from...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates