Addition u/s 69C - Unexplained expenses/premium - assessee did ...

Court Deletes Unexplained Expenses Addition u/s 69C Due to Unequal Treatment Among Co-Owners.

June 6, 2022

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Addition u/s 69C - Unexplained expenses/premium - assessee did not furnish the source of payment of such expenses/premium - The case of assessee throughout the proceedings was that she is not having sufficient income. The expenses incurred by the other co-owners on her behalf and that no such similar addition was made in case of other co-owners, on whose behalf similar expenses were incurred by other co-owners. - It is settled law that the assessee cannot be treated as indifferently in respect of expenses or treatment of capital gain. - Additions deleted - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Addition u/s 69C - Unexplained expenses/premium - assessee did ...

Court Deletes Unexplained Expenses Addition u/s 69C Due to Unequal Treatment Among Co-Owners.

June 6, 2022

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The CIT(A) partly allowed and restricted the addition on account of commission expenses at 0.25% as compared to 2% adopted by the Assessing Officer. The coordinate bench...

Key legal issues and the Tribunal's holdings: Agricultural land sold by assessee situated beyond municipal limits cannot be treated as capital asset u/s 2(14). Addition...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the legality of additions based on a diary seized from a third party. The Tribunal held that the presumption u/s 132(4A) of the Act...

Addition u/s 69C - excess stock - 69B OR 69C - mentioning of wrong section would not upset the Additions made by the AO as all these provisions have been enacted with a...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the issue of condonation of delay in filing appeals, which exceeded 400 days, due to unexplained cash deposits and protective additions...

Addition made u/s 69C - Unexplained huge expenditure to earn Agriculture income - once the assessee has not made any investment, the addition made u/s 69C of the Act is illegal.

Addition u/s 69C - CIT(A) deleted the addition - in order to invoke the provisions of sec. 69C, should give a categorical finding that the assessee has incurred any...

Unexplained expenditure u/s 69C - The High Court found that the Assessing Officer's reliance on cumulative figures provided by CBIC, without specifying the individual...

The Appellate Tribunal held that the addition u/s 56(2)(vii) or 28(iv) was unjustified, as the purchase was made with consideration, cheques were given to sellers with...

The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions u/ss 69C and 68 for undisclosed credit card expenditures in foreign currencies based on material found during a survey. The...

Jurisdictional issue regarding notice u/s 143(2) was addressed, with ITAT holding that the initial notice by ACIT, Circle-5(1), Delhi was within time, and subsequent...

Addition u/s.69C - unexplained expenditure - Admittedly, in the first round of proceedings, there was no addition made u/s. 69C by the revenue. AO could not have made...

Addition u/s 69C – Unexplained expenditure - only because parties has given a different accounting treatment in its books of account, it cannot be said that the assessee...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) adjudicated on various additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) as unexplained/bogus credits or trading liabilities. The...

Unexplained expenditures and unaccounted cash payment - Onus to proof - once the revenue has treated the entire amount of expenditure as unexplained expense under...

Quick Updates: