Penalty u/s 271G - requirement of maintenance of segment ...

Taxpayer Avoids Penalty for Not Maintaining Segment Profitability Details; Tribunal Upholds CIT(A)'s Decision u/s 271G.

June 16, 2022

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty u/s 271G - requirement of maintenance of segment profitability between AEs and non-AEs transactions - non-maintenance of details in terms of section 92D(3) of IT Act r.w. Rule 10D of Income Tax Rules, 1962 - in the instant case there was reasonable cause for non-maintaining the details, which were required in terms of Rule 10D of the Rules - CIT(A) rightly deleted the penalty - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271G - requirement of maintenance of segment ...

Taxpayer Avoids Penalty for Not Maintaining Segment Profitability Details; Tribunal Upholds CIT(A)'s Decision u/s 271G.

June 16, 2022

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271G - assessee was unable to submit internal TNMM by working out the profitability of AE and non-AE segment - due to peculiar nature of the product and...

TP Adjustment - Design Engineering Services - in the TP study report assessee applied margins at the entity level - it cannot be precluded from furnishing segmental...

Penalty u/s. 271G - assessee did not provide any basis for comparing the transactions and it failed to provide any alternative method to benchmark the transactions which...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) adjudicated on various transfer pricing issues concerning an assessee. Regarding segmentation of business activities, the ITAT...

The ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal, holding that penalty under s.271G for failure to furnish transfer pricing documentation cannot be levied against the German resident...

The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered an addition u/s 69 concerning a difference in agreed and actual deal value, attributed to unexplained source of stamp duty...

Penalty u/s. 270A - Under-reporting of income / Mis-reporting - Interest income from income tax refunds - After reviewing the submissions and case materials, the...

CBIC clarifies procedure for departmental appeals regarding interest/penalty under Section 128A of CGST Act. Where taxpayers have fully paid tax demands under Section 73...

The ITAT ruled that penalties under sections 271(1)(c) and 270A against the taxpayer were improper and directed their deletion. The tribunal held that merely making an...

The case involves Transfer Pricing (TP) adjustments and the classification of segments for benchmarking purposes. The Appellate Tribunal held that TP adjustments should...

The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the issue of penalty u/s 271B for failure to maintain and audit books of accounts under section 44AB. The assessee did not...

Quantum of penalty under section 10(A) of the CST Act - The Tribunal after detailed analysis, came to the conclusion that there was mensrea on the part of the petitioner...

ITAT affirmed CIT(A)'s directive to grant TDS credit per Form 26AS despite taxpayer's initial failure to claim full credit in tax return due to software technical issues....

Penalty proceedings u/s 270A - Applicable rate of penalty - The Appellate Tribunal noted that while the penalty notice cited under-reporting of income, the AO imposed...

ITAT set aside penalty under s271DA for cash receipts exceeding Rs. 2 lakhs, finding reasonable cause in taxpayer's interpretation of s269ST's "single transaction"...

Quick Updates: