Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights July 2022 Year 2022 This

Interest on demands made by the appellant during investigation - ...


Tribunal Rules Section 11B Inapplicable: Appellant's Deposits Not Considered Duty, Time Bar Not Applicable.

July 13, 2022

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

Interest on demands made by the appellant during investigation - any deposits made if have not been confirmed as duty the time bar of Section 11B of Central Excise Act cannot be invoked. It stands clear that the amount in question was not the amount of duty after the Tribunal set aside the duty liability of the appellant. Hence, it is held that section 11 B is not applicable to such deposits. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The issue pertained to the validity of filing a revised return after the prescribed time limit. The High Court set aside the Tribunal's order, stating that after the...

  2. Validity of Assessment order as time barred - delay dispatching assessment order - The Tribunal, after considering the submissions and relevant precedents, concluded...

  3. Rebate claim – refund claim was time barred - rebate claim was rightly rejected as time barred but the re-credit of duty paid in Cenvat account is not admissible - CGOVT

  4. Rejection of cross objections as time barred - in the Act, no such time period is prescribed. Time fixed by the learned Appellate Authority was fixed by him and there...

  5. Refund claim was rejected as time-barred, having been filed beyond the one-year limitation period stipulated u/s 27 of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellant had...

  6. Sustainability of cess, when basic customs duty itself was Nil - contention of the department is barring the basic customs duty, other duties namely EC, SHEC and SWS...

  7. The Appellate Tribunal addressed the rejection of an application for approval u/s 80G as time-barred. Provisional registration was introduced for newly formed trusts....

  8. Rejection of refund claim - GTA Service - time limitation - The tribunal reaffirmed the previous tribunal orders that transportation of coal within and outside mining...

  9. Valuation - export duty - Liability to pay customs duty on the FOB value, on export of iron ore fines considering the same as cum-duty value or otherwise - After...

  10. Initiation of CIRP - time limitation - personal guarantors - It is submitted that Adjudicating Authority cannot be used as a Forum to recover a time barred debt - The...

  11. The appellant manufactured 'Gold Dore Bars' having purity less than 95% from gold ore/concentrate and claimed exemption under Notification No. 12/2012-CE as 'Gold Bars'....

  12. The appellant's Daman unit mistakenly paid duty liability of their Halol unit due to an error in the ERP system meant for all group units. The issue pertains to...

  13. CESTAT upheld rejection of a customs duty refund claim filed on 09.01.2024 relating to payments made via challans between March-December 2017 under EPCG scheme. The...

  14. The case involves a Section 9 application to determine if payment for ten invoices by the Operational Creditor was time-barred and if a preexisting dispute existed. The...

  15. Extended period of limitation - Merely that assessee is PSU is not sufficient to set aside the SCN as being barred by time - SCN not barred by time.

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates