Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights July 2022 Year 2022 This

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - an order which is deemed to be ...

Case Laws     Income Tax

July 22, 2022

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - an order which is deemed to be erroneous in so far as it prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue - the AO has adopted one possible legal view sustainable in law on the issue and mere invoking proviso based on revenue audit objection amounts non application of mind. Merely just because the view taken by the AO was not found acceptable does not mean that the AO has failed to make requisite enquiries. - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The phrase prejudicial to the interest of revenue has to be read in conjunction with an erroneous order passed by the A.O. Every loss of...

  2. The AO's order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the revenue's interests. The filing fee for increasing share capital was rightly allowed as revenue expenditure,...

  3. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Total power subsidy and TUF subsidy were wrongly declared by the assessee - When AO adopted one of the courses permissible in law and it has...

  4. Revision u/s 263 - Every loss of revenue as a consequence of an order of AO cannot be treated as prejudicial to the interests of the revenue, for example, when an...

  5. The ITAT addressed a case involving revision u/s 263 where the main allegation was the non-disclosure of agricultural income affecting the deduction u/s 54B. The...

  6. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - An incorrect assumption of the fact or an incorrect application of law will satisfy the requirement of the order being erroneous. The phrase...

  7. Validity of Revision u/s 263 - An order which is prejudicial to revenue even if no Tax Loss - The High Court found that the AO's assessment did not adequately address...

  8. AO failed to conduct proper inquiries regarding genuineness of loan transactions for property acquisition. Bank statements revealed assessee lacked funds, payments made...

  9. The Commissioner's invocation of Section 263 for revision of the assessment order was unjustified as the twin conditions of the order being erroneous and prejudicial to...

  10. Case involved revision u/s 263 by the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) setting aside assessment order regarding rent recovered from specified persons and treatment of...

  11. Revision u/s 263 - tds credit issue non examination by AO - non examination of an issue by the AO renders the assessment erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the revenue

  12. AO failed to examine details, relied solely on assessee's submissions, resulting in erroneous assessment prejudicial to Revenue's interests. Assessee borrowed...

  13. Revision u/s 263 - an order prejudicial and erroneous to the revenue - though the order passed by the A.O. is prejudicial to the interest of the revenue but it is not...

  14. Revision u/s 263 - Erroneous or prejudicial of revenue - AO allowed the Exemption u/s. 10(34) - Insurance business - Dividend income - The order passed by the AO...

  15. Revision u/s 263 - The words “as he deems necessary”, in our view, do not mean that the Ld. PCIT was left with a choice either to make or not to make an enquiry. As per...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates